Helmet Use Among E-Bike, Pedal Bike, and E-Scooter Riders in Canberra: Observational and Quasi-Experimental Signage Intervention Study (Phases 1 and 2)
Silburn, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundHelmet use is a proven safety measure that reduces the risk of head injury among cyclists and e-scooter riders. Despite legal requirements for pedal bikes and e-bikes in Australia, compliance varies, particularly among users of electric vehicles. The growing popularity of e-bikes and e-scooters in urban areas presents new public health challenges, yet observational data on helmet use, behavioural determinants, and the effectiveness of safety interventions remain limited. AimPhases 1 and 2 aim to assess helmet use among e-bike, pedal bike, and e-scooter riders in Canberra, and evaluate the impact of health-benefit and legal-penalty signage on compliance. MethodsThis study employs a multi-phase, quasi-experimental observational design across three urban bike paths in Canberra. Phase 1 (Baseline): Helmet use will be recorded via discreet video surveillance, capturing vehicle type, estimated age group, gender presentation, and weather conditions. Phase 2 (Intervention): Two sites will receive signage emphasising either safety benefits or legal penalties, while a third site serves as a control; post-intervention observations will assess changes in helmet compliance. Expected ResultsBaseline helmet use is expected to be higher among pedal bike riders than e-bike and e-scooter riders. Signage interventions are anticipated to increase compliance, with potential variation by message type, vehicle type, and rider demographics. Trial RegistrationAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) [ACTRN12626000245392]
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Ethical considerations related to drone use for environment and health research: a scoping review protocol 94%
- Expanding Capabilities to Evaluate Readiness for Return to Duty after mTBI: The CAMP Study Protocol 92%
- Organized community sport participation in children and youth with physical disability: a scoping review protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 International Border Surveillance Cohort Study at Toronto’s Pearson Airport 91%
- Taking a participatory research approach within workplace health promotion research to improve physical activity levels in office-based workers: a scoping review protocol 91%
- Cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 and associated risk factors among healthcare workers in the Eastern Cape, South Africa 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Epidemiological Patterns of Motorcycle-Related Injuries in Cameroon: A Comparative Analysis of Motorcycle Users and Pedestrians 93%
- Let’s just ask them. Perspectives on urban dwelling and air quality: a cross-sectional survey of 3,222 children, young people and parents 91%
- Who participates in ‘participatory design’ of WASH infrastructure: a mixed-methods process evaluation 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- InterMob: A 24-month randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of an intervention including behavioural change techniques and free transport versus an intervention including air pollution awareness-raising on car use reduction among regular car users living in Grenoble, France 92%
- Physical Activity Behaviour in Middle-Aged and Older Canadian Women and Men: An Analysis of the CLSA 90%
- Engagement with daily testing instead of self-isolating in contacts of confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Impact of a Night Travel Ban Policy on Road Traffic Accidents: Interrupted Time Series evidence in Zambia 92%
- Spatially regulated designs of incidence surveys can match the precision of classical survey designs whilst requiring smaller sample sizes: the case of snakebite in Sri Lanka 89%
- Geographic barriers to establishing a successful hospital referral system in rural Madagascar 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.