Back

Effectiveness of new treatment modalities for localized prostate cancer through patient-reported outcome measures: 5 years comparative study.

Miranda-Martins, A.; Garin, O.; Suarez, J. F.; Gutierrez, C.; Guedea, F.; Cabrera, P.; Castells, M.; Herruzo, I.; Fumado, L.; Samper, P.; Ferrer, C.; Regis, L.; Pont, A.; Ferrer, M.

2026-03-05 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.03.04.26347624 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundNo randomized clinical trial comparing the most established new modalities of treatment for patients with localized prostate cancer has been published, and there is scarce comparative effectiveness research assessing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). Objectiveto compare the impact of active surveillance, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and real-time brachytherapy on patients, through PROMs, from pre-treatment to five years after diagnosis of localized prostate cancer. MethodsProspective observational study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05523856) of 566 male patients diagnosed in 2014 to 2021 with clinically localized prostate cancer (50-75 years old; stage cT1 or cT2, N0/Nx and M0/Mx; Gleason [≤] 6 or 7 (if 3 + 4 with T1c); and PSA [≤] 10 ng/ml) and followed until 2019-2026. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26) measures urinary incontinence, urinary irritative/obstructive symptoms, sexual, bowel and hormonal domains. EPIC-26 was centrally administered via telephone interviews before treatment and then annually after treatment. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) models were constructed with overlap propensity score-based weights and adjusted by age and clinical tumor stage. ResultsWeighted results of adjusted GEE models showed significant declines for sexual health during the 5yr in all treatment groups (ranging from -19.8 to -27.6), but this worsening appeared earlier in those of active treatment (RARP, IMRT and brachytherapy) than in active surveillance. The RARP group presented the greatest deterioration in urinary incontinence (-28.5 vs -11.7 in active surveillance), while the greatest impairment in bowel symptoms was observed in both radiotherapy groups (around -3 vs +0.3 in active surveillance). ConclusionOur findings provide detailed novel evidence, measured over 5 yr, on the long-term impact of disease and treatment on patients with localized prostate cancer. While all treatment groups showed large sexual deterioration overtime, important differences in urinary incontinence (highest after RARP) and bowel symptoms (after IMRT and brachytherapy) persisted. These findings can inform patients during shared decision-making on the alignment between localized prostate cancer treatment choices and their priorities.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.2%
2
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.3%
4
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.0%
6
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
9
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
11
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
12
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
The Prostate
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
14
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
15
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
16
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
18
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
19
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
21
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
22
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
24
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
28
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
30
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%