Effectiveness of new treatment modalities for localized prostate cancer through patient-reported outcome measures: 5 years comparative study.
Miranda-Martins, A.; Garin, O.; Suarez, J. F.; Gutierrez, C.; Guedea, F.; Cabrera, P.; Castells, M.; Herruzo, I.; Fumado, L.; Samper, P.; Ferrer, C.; Regis, L.; Pont, A.; Ferrer, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundNo randomized clinical trial comparing the most established new modalities of treatment for patients with localized prostate cancer has been published, and there is scarce comparative effectiveness research assessing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). Objectiveto compare the impact of active surveillance, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and real-time brachytherapy on patients, through PROMs, from pre-treatment to five years after diagnosis of localized prostate cancer. MethodsProspective observational study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05523856) of 566 male patients diagnosed in 2014 to 2021 with clinically localized prostate cancer (50-75 years old; stage cT1 or cT2, N0/Nx and M0/Mx; Gleason [≤] 6 or 7 (if 3 + 4 with T1c); and PSA [≤] 10 ng/ml) and followed until 2019-2026. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26) measures urinary incontinence, urinary irritative/obstructive symptoms, sexual, bowel and hormonal domains. EPIC-26 was centrally administered via telephone interviews before treatment and then annually after treatment. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) models were constructed with overlap propensity score-based weights and adjusted by age and clinical tumor stage. ResultsWeighted results of adjusted GEE models showed significant declines for sexual health during the 5yr in all treatment groups (ranging from -19.8 to -27.6), but this worsening appeared earlier in those of active treatment (RARP, IMRT and brachytherapy) than in active surveillance. The RARP group presented the greatest deterioration in urinary incontinence (-28.5 vs -11.7 in active surveillance), while the greatest impairment in bowel symptoms was observed in both radiotherapy groups (around -3 vs +0.3 in active surveillance). ConclusionOur findings provide detailed novel evidence, measured over 5 yr, on the long-term impact of disease and treatment on patients with localized prostate cancer. While all treatment groups showed large sexual deterioration overtime, important differences in urinary incontinence (highest after RARP) and bowel symptoms (after IMRT and brachytherapy) persisted. These findings can inform patients during shared decision-making on the alignment between localized prostate cancer treatment choices and their priorities.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.