A Qualitative Study of Patient and Healthcare Provider Perspectives on Mobile Health Assessments for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
Singh, P.; Gonuguntla, S.; Chen, E.; Pradhan, A.; Becker, I.; Xu, N.; Steel, B.; Arkam, F.; Yakdan, S.; Benedict, B.; Naveed, H.; Wang, W.; Guo, W.; Wilt, Z.; Badhiwala, J.; Hafez, D.; Ogunlade, J.; Ray, W. Z.; Ghogawala, Z.; Kelleher, C.; Greenberg, J. K.
Show abstract
Structured Abstract (for clinical articles and laboratory investigations)O_ST_ABSObjectiveC_ST_ABSEvaluating and monitoring patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) remains a challenge due to limited tools for assessing objective neurological disability longitudinally and in the home environment. Given their prevalence and low cost, mobile health (mHealth), and specifically smartphone technologies offer a promising approach to fill this gap. This study explored stakeholder perspectives on the role of mHealth in CSM monitoring to inform development of a smartphone-based assessment application. MethodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 patients with CSM and 14 healthcare providers (spine surgeons, physical therapists, and occupational therapists). Interviews explored current assessment practices, perceived limitations, and attitudes toward mHealth integration. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. ResultsTwo major themes emerged from provider interviews: (1) diagnosing and monitoring CSM is challenging due to limitations in current tools, and (2) mHealth presents significant opportunities but requires thoughtful integration. Providers described current methods and technologies, clinical signs and symptoms, and challenges evaluating patients. Current tools were viewed as inadequate for precision medicine, with inter-rater variability and inability to capture real-world function. Within the second theme, providers identified ways mHealth could improve care, challenges for integration, and practical implementation considerations. Patients expressed strong interest in objective, longitudinal monitoring of gait, dexterity, and daily function. ConclusionsStakeholders recognized substantial potential for mHealth to address unmet needs in CSM assessment. Successful implementation will require intuitive design, electronic medical record integration, and attention to accessibility. These findings provide a foundation for user-centered development of digital health tools in CSM care.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Patient and Staff Experiences of Video Consultations During COVID-19 in an English Outpatient Care Setting: Secondary Data Analysis of Routinely Collected Feedback Data 95%
- Improving emergency department patient-doctor conversation through an artificial intelligence symptom taking tool: an action-oriented design pilot study 93%
- Developing a psychological support intervention to help injured athletes get Back in the Game 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Barriers and facilitators to implementing core osteoarthritis treatments in China: a mixed-method study 94%
- Doctors of chiropractic working with or within integrated health care delivery systems: a scoping review protocol 94%
- Tracking Persistent Symptoms in Scotland (TraPSS): A Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study of COVID-19 Recovery After Mild Acute Infection 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of assistive technology to assess distal motor function in subjects with neuromuscular disease 94%
- Theory of radiologist interaction with instant messaging decision support tools: a sequential-explanatory study 94%
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The role of Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in pre-clinical spinal cord research: an interview study 95%
- Design of a Clinical Balance Tool for Fall Risk Assessments: A Development and Usability Study 95%
- Use of patient centred outcomes measures alongside the personal wheelchair budget process in NHS England: a mixed methods approach to exploring the staff and service user experience of using the WATCh and WATCh-Ad Tools 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation 92%
- Measures of socioeconomic advantage are not independent predictors of support for healthcare AI: subgroup analysis of a national Australian survey 92%
- User Testing of a Diagnostic Decision Support System with Machine-assisted Chart Review to Facilitate Clinical Genomic Diagnosis 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.