Back

Effectiveness of a family-led postnatal care model: A pre-post intervention pilot study in the Adaa District, Ethiopia

Regassa, G. B.; Berhanu, D.; Wolde, K.; Teno, D.; Amdissa, L.; Yallew, W. W.; Sripad, P.; Hyre, A.; Noguchi, L.; Worku, A.

2026-03-04 public and global health
10.64898/2026.03.04.26347595 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPostnatal care is crucial for assessing and improving the health of both mothers and newborns, yet its coverage remains low in Ethiopia. Timely, high-quality postnatal care, especially within the first week after birth, is essential to reduce maternal and neonatal mortality. Family-led postnatal care is an innovative model for reaching postnatal mothers and newborns during the first week after birth. Leveraging self-care principles, mothers, with the support from family and guided by a checklist, perform daily postnatal health checks on themselves and their newborns. This study evaluated the effect of a family-led postnatal care intervention on coverage of postnatal checks within seven days of birth. MethodsThis study used pre- and post-intervention cross-sectional surveys in four health centers. Eligible postnatal mothers who gave birth in the study health centers were interviewed pre- (November 2022 to January 2023) and post-intervention (February to April 2023) using a structured questionnaire. Bivariate tests and descriptive analyses were used to assess changes in postnatal care coverage over time. ResultsSurveys were completed with a total of 119 mothers pre-intervention and 110 mothers post-intervention. In the pre-intervention period, 9% (11/119) of mothers and 11% (13/119) of newborns had a postnatal check between 24 and 72 hours after birth, whereas in the post-intervention period this increased to 96% (105/110) mothers and 96% (105/110) newborns (P<0.0001). A similar increase occurred in the proportion of mothers and newborns having postnatal checks between 73 hours and 7 days (3% vs. 96%, P< 0.0001). Compared to pre-intervention, a larger proportion of mothers detected a maternal danger sign during the post-intervention period (6.7% vs 18.2%, P<0.008). ConclusionFamily-led postnatal care is a promising self-care model that may increase postnatal checks for mothers and newborns who would not otherwise have received care. Evaluating this model in other settings using a more rigorous design is recommended. Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05563974), first posted on 3 October 2022.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.0%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
17.0%
3
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
4
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.1%
5
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.8%
7
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
8
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
9
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
10
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
12
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
13
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
14
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
15
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
16
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
18
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
19
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
21
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 76%
0.7%
24
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
25
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
27
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
28
Tropical Medicine & International Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
29
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%