Back

Neptune: a toolbox for spinal cord functional MRI data processing and quality assurance

Rangaprakash, D.; Barry, R. L.

2026-03-05 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.03.03.709443 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Over the past two decades, open-source research software such as SPM, AFNI and FSL formed the substrate for advancements in the brain functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) field. The spinal cord fMRI field has matured substantially over the past decade, yet there is limited research software tailored for processing cord fMRI data that has distinct noise sources, unique challenges, niche processing requirements and special needs. Spinal cord fMRI data analysis is a different beast, involving specialized pre- and post-processing steps due to the cords unique anatomy and higher distortions/physiological noise, thus requiring extensive and careful quality assessment. Building upon 10+ years of research and development, we present Neptune - a user-interface-based MATLAB toolbox. With 30,000+ lines of in-house code, it is designed to be easy to use and does not require programming knowledge. Neptune builds on our previously published 15-step pre-processing pipeline (Barry et al., 2016) and presents a 19-step pipeline with new processing steps, and enhancements to existing steps. Neptune has a 4-step post-processing pipeline aimed at fMRI connectivity modeling. It generates extensive and novel quality control visuals to enable a thorough assessment of data quality, and displays them in an elegant webpage format. We demonstrate the utility of Neptune on our 7T data. Certain features of the popular Spinal Cord Toolbox (SCT) are integrated into Neptune, and users can import/export between Neptune and other software such as FSL and SPM. The availability of this open-source, easy-to-use software will benefit the spinal cord fMRI community, and also tip the cost-benefit balance for brain fMRI researchers to invest in learning new software to conduct important neuroscientific and clinical research using spinal cord fMRI.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
25.9%
2
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.5%
3
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
8.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Aperture Neuro
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
6
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
8
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
9
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
10
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
11
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
12
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.3%
16
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
18
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
20
Brain Topography
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
81 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%