Back

Subclonal Complete Loss of CDKN1B as a Common Genomic Alteration in Prostate Cancer: Associations with Race and Prostate Cancer Outcomes

Sfanos, K.; Morton, R.; Flores, J.; Sosa, R.; Ernst, S.; Mummert, L.; Hicks, J.; Lotan, T. L.; Lu, J.; Jing, Y.; Joshu, C.; De Marzo, A. M.

2026-03-05 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.03.03.709424 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundHomozygous biallelic inactivation of CDKN1B is thought to be rare in cancer. Herein we evaluate the prevalence of intratumoral (subclonal) complete p27 protein loss (IPPL) in primary prostate cancer. Experimental DesignWe used immunohistochemistry (IHC) for p27 in a large cohort of whole tissue sections from radical prostatectomy (n=412) and metastases from self-identified African American (AA) and European American (EA) individuals. IPPL was evaluated alongside CDKN1B mRNA in-situ hybridization and next generation sequencing of laser captured cancer regions. Cox proportional hazards analyses assessed the association of IPPL with biochemical recurrence and development of metastases after radical prostatectomy. ResultsIPPL was detected in 18.1% of AA versus 12.2% of EA cases and was tightly correlated with CDKN1B mRNA loss and biallelic genomic loss. IPPL was associated with [≥]pT3 pathologic stage and pN1 disease, however these associations were only significant among AA participants. IPPL was further associated in both univariate and multivariate analyses with the development of biochemical recurrence and metastasis after primary treatment, specifically in AA individuals. The prevalence of p27 genomic alterations in metastatic disease is higher than that of primary prostate cancer in publicly available datasets as well as our analysis of autopsy cases via IHC, indicating that complete p27 loss may be selected for in metastatic disease. ConclusionsSubclonal biallelic loss of CDKN1B resulting in complete p27 protein loss is one of the most commonly occurring biallelic tumor suppressor genomic alterations in primary prostate cancer, and could contribute to worse prostate cancer outcomes, specifically in AA males.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
2
The Prostate
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
3
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.4%
5
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.4%
6
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.6%
8
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
9
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
10
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.6%
11
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
13
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
14
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
15
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Neoplasia
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Molecular Cancer Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
18
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
19
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
21
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
22
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
23
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
24
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
26
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
27
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
28
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%