Back

Trait Absorption Amplifies the Path to Spatial Presence in Highly Immersive Virtual Reality: Attentional Mediation and Dose-Response Effects

Hayes, H. R.; Campagnoli, C.

2026-03-05 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.03.03.709394 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Virtual Reality (VR) applications depend on eliciting spatial presence, the subjective experience of being physically located within a virtual environment. Although individual differences have long been theorised to contribute to this experience, their role in highly immersive VR systems remains contested. The present study investigated whether trait absorption predicts spatial presence and whether this relationship is mediated by attention allocation. Seventy participants (44 female, 26 male; M age = 22.90, SD = 4.88) completed a 6-minute VR session using a Meta Quest 3 Head-Mounted Display and validated self-report measures of trait absorption (Tellegen Absorption Scale), attention allocation, and spatial presence (MEC-Spatial Presence Questionnaire). Path analysis confirmed a significant, complete mediation pathway: trait absorption positively predicted attention allocation ({beta} = 0.27, p = .013), which in turn strongly predicted spatial presence ({beta} = 0.54, p < .001). The direct path from absorption to spatial presence was non-significant ({beta} = 0.11, p = .325), indicating complete mediation. The indirect effect was significant ({beta} = 0.15; 95% BCa CI [0.025, 0.291]). The model explained a sizeable 33.8% of the variance in spatial presence (Cohens f{superscript 2} = 0.51). Post-hoc dose-response analysis revealed that trait absorption acts as a cognitive amplifier: the strength of the attention-presence relationship tripled from low-absorption ({beta} = 0.33, R{superscript 2} = .15) to high-absorption individuals ({beta} = 1.00, R{superscript 2} = .56). These findings demonstrate that individual differences remain important in highly immersive VR by modulating the effectiveness of attentional focus, offering promising directions for tailoring VR interventions.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.2%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 2%
15.2%
3
Consciousness and Cognition
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
4
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
6
Human Movement Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
7
Behavior Research Methods
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
8
Neuroscience of Consciousness
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
9
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
10
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
11
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
12
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.4%
13
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
14
Journal of Vision
92 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
15
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
16
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
17
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
18
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
20
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.5%
26
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.5%
27
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.5%