Back

Automated Phenotyping of Mitral Stenosis Using Deep Learning

Ieki, H.; Sahashi, Y.; Vukadinovic, M.; Rawlani, M.; Kim, I.; Ambrosy, A. P.; Go, A. S.; He, B.; Cheng, P.; Ouyang, D.

2026-03-04 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.03.03.26347557 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and AimsAccurate classification of mitral stenosis (MS) remains a significant clinical challenge. This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) framework to automatically detect clinically significant MS from echocardiography. MethodsWe developed EchoNet-MS, an open-source end-to-end integrated approach combining video based convolutional neural networks to assess MS severity and differentiate rheumatic etiology from echocardiography and validated its performance across four cohorts. ResultsEchoNet-MS was trained and validated in total of 431,612 videos from 44,671 studies from three different healthcare system. Combining assessments from multiple echocardiographic videos, the model was trained on a Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) cohort of 8,677 studies from 7,576 patients with a range of MS severity. The model was validated on a KPNC held-out test cohort (N=1,623) and a temporally distinct cohort (N=19,206), as well as Stanford Healthcare (SHC) cohort (N=3,333) and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (CSMC) cohort (N=72,909). EchoNet-MS achieved excellent discrimination of severe MS with AUC 0.937 [95% CI: 0.913 - 0.958] in the KPNC held-out cohort, 0.994 [0.986 - 0.999] in the temporally distinct cohort, 0.991 [0.986 - 0.995] in SHC, and 0.973 [0.958 - 0.987] in CSMC. The model achieved excellent performance in classifying both rheumatic or non-rheumatic MS with AUC ranging from 0.890 and 0.967. ConclusionsEchoNet-MS accurately assesses MS severity and etiology using information from multiple echocardiographic views. Its strong performance generalizes robustly to external cohorts and shows potential as an automated clinical decision support tool.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.0%
4
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
5
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.9%
7
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
8
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
9
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
10
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
11
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.9%
15
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
16
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
17
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
Nature Cardiovascular Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
19
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
20
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%