Back

Streamlining Eligibility Assessment for Alzheimers Disease-Modifying Therapies: Prediction of MMSE Scores Using the Digital Clock and Recall

Jannati, A.; Toro-Serey, C.; Ciesla, M.; Chen, E.; Showalter, J.; Bates, D.; Pascual-Leone, A.; Tobyne, S.

2026-03-04 neurology
10.64898/2026.03.03.26347542 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionThe eligibility of anti-amyloid disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) and their integration into clinical practice in some institutions requires a specific range of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores. Reliance on this pencil-and-paper psychometric instrument imposes operational burdens and risks perpetuating health disparities due to the tests known educational and cultural biases. This study evaluates the efficacy of the Digital Clock and Recall (DCR) - a rapid, FDA-listed digital cognitive assessment - to crosswalk to MMSE scores using machine learning, thereby offering a faster, scalable, and equitable mechanism for patient triage. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis using data from the multi-site Bio-Hermes-001 study (NCT04733989, N=945). Participants were clinically classified as cognitively unimpaired, mild cognitive Impairment, or probable Alzheimers dementia. We trained a Poisson elastic net regression model using age and multimodal digital features derived from the DCR (including drawing kinematics and voice acoustics) to predict MMSE scores. The model was tested for generalizability using an independent external validation cohort from the Apheleia study (NCT05364307, N=238). ResultsThe machine learning model predicted MMSE scores with a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 2.31 in the training cohort. This error margin falls within the established test-retest reliability range of the manual MMSE itself (2-4 points), suggesting the prediction is statistically non-inferior to human administration. External validation in the Apheleia cohort demonstrated robust generalizability (RMSE = 2.62). Crucially, the model exhibited demographic fairness, maintaining consistent accuracy across Race (White RMSE = 2.34; Non-White RMSE = 2.14) and Ethnicity (Hispanic RMSE = 2.26; Non-Hispanic RMSE = 2.31). DiscussionMachine learning can leverage multimodal features from the DCR to accurately and equitably crosswalk to MMSE scores in support of current guidelines, transforming a time-intensive manual test into a rapid, automated assessment. By deploying this "digital triage" engine, where traditional assessments are still used for DMT eligibility, healthcare systems can streamline the identification of DMT-eligible patients, reduce specialist referral bottlenecks, and ensure that access to life-altering therapies is determined by pathology rather than demography.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
19.8%
2
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.1%
3
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.3%
4
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
52 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.5%
6
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
7
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
8
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
9
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
11
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
12
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
13
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
14
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
16
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
17
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
18
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
20
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%