Back

Population-scale burden analysis of rare damaging coding variants identifies novel risk genes for Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease

Le Guen, Y.; Pena-Tauber, A.; Catoia Pulgrossi, R.; Park, J.; Orias, H.; Greicius, M. D.

2026-03-04 neurology
10.64898/2026.03.03.26347540 medRxiv
Show abstract

Alzheimers disease and related dementias (ADRD)1 and Parkinsons disease and related disorders (PDRD)2 have substantial genetic contributions, yet the role of rare damaging coding variants remains incompletely characterized at population scale3-6. We performed gene-based burden testing of rare loss-of-function and deleterious missense variants using whole-genome sequencing data from large population biobanks combined with disease-specific sequencing cohorts, leveraging proxy phenotypes to maximize statistical power for late-onset neurodegenerative diseases7. We confirmed rare variant burden in established ADRD genes (ABCA7, PSEN1, ADAM10, ATP8B4, GRN, SORL1, TREM2, SHARPIN) and PDRD genes (GBA1, LRRK2). We additionally identified novel associations in ADRD (IMPA2, PMM2, SYNE1, CHRNA4, FCGR1A) and PDRD (ANKRD27, CCL7, USP19, SKP1, KANSL3). The strongest signal was observed for ANKRD27, where damaging variants clustered within domains mediating interactions with Rab GTPases and retromer components. Our results demonstrate the power of population-scale sequencing combined with proxy phenotypes to identify rare coding risk genes for neurodegenerative diseases.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Genetics
○ 286 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Nature Medicine
○ 125 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.1%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 17%
11.0%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
4
Alzheimer's & Dementia
177 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.5%
5
Molecular Neurodegeneration
○ 55 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.2%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Nature Neuroscience
○ 252 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
7
Annals of Neurology
○ 64 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.9%
8
Brain
◐ 168 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
9
eBioMedicine
○ 183 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
10
Nature
○ 645 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.8%
11
Neurology Genetics
○ 15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
12
Nature Aging
○ 60 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
13
Acta Neuropathologica
○ 58 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
14
Nature Biomedical Engineering
○ 47 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
15
Movement Disorders
○ 71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
16
Molecular Psychiatry
○ 282 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
17
Nature Cancer
○ 39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
npj Parkinson's Disease
○ 105 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.2%
19
Communications Medicine
○ 113 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.6%
21
Scientific Data
○ 209 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
22
Nature Computational Science
○ 55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Neurology
○ 50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
○ 84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
Neuron
○ 337 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.