Skin Residual Bilirubin Volume (SRBV): A Physiologically Informed Framework for Transcutaneous Bilirubin Interpretation in Neonates
Amadi, H. O.
Show abstract
BackgroundNeonatal jaundice management increasingly relies on transcutaneous bilirubinometry (TcB), yet discrepancies with serum bilirubin (TSB) have limited its clinical reliability. This study introduces Skin Residual Bilirubin Volume (SRBV) as a physiologically grounded framework to enhance TcB interpretation. ObjectiveTo evaluate SRBV as an explanation for TcB-TSB discordance and assess whether incorporating SRBV improves the interpretability and reliability of TcB measurements during diagnosis, phototherapy, and recovery. MethodsTcB readings (MBj20) were calibrated against laboratory TSB in non-jaundiced neonates (TSB <3 mg/dL). Neonates undergoing phototherapy were monitored using paired TcB measurements before and after treatment breaks (TBL-out and TBL-return). TSB was measured before treatment, at mid-treatment, and prior to discharge. Patterns of TcB-TSB disparity and an observed reproducible Recovery Value Flip (RVP) phenomenon were analysed. ResultsAcross 102 neonates, TBL consistently equalled or exceeded TSB, supporting the additive SRBV model. Early in phototherapy, TBL-return > TBL-out, indicating persistent cutaneous bilirubin. A reproducible RVP occurred mid-treatment, after which TBL-return < TBL-out coincided with sustained bilirubin decline. Fractional SRBV contribution increased with baseline bilirubin and persisted into recovery, demonstrating dynamic, patient-specific cutaneous bilirubin retention. ConclusionSRBV provides a biologically plausible explanation for TcB-TSB discordance and dynamic TcB behaviour. Incorporating SRBV into TcB interpretation enables physiologically informed monitoring, improving safety and reliability in laboratory-limited neonatal settings. Significance StatementTranscutaneous bilirubinometry is widely used but limited by disagreement with serum bilirubin. This study introduces SRBV as a physiological explanation for TcB variability and proposes an SRBV-adjusted framework that transforms TcB measurements into actionable, non-invasive clinical guidance.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Smartphone screening for neonatal jaundice via ambient-subtracted sclera chromaticity: neoSCB app pilot study 93%
- Impact of Skin Tone, Environmental, and Technical Factors on Thermal Imaging 92%
- Comparison of haemoglobin concentration measurements using HemoCue-301 and Sysmex XN-Series 1500: a survey among anaemic Gambian infants aged 6-12 months 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-invasive detection of bilirubin concentrations during the first week of life in a low-resource setting along the Thailand-Myanmar border 96%
- Investigation of factors associated with delayed initiation of breastfeeding in Papua New Guinea: a cross-sectional study 88%
- A Safety and Feasibility Trial Protocol of Metformin in Infants after Perinatal Brain Injury 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Application of machine learning to discriminate photoreceptor cell species in xenotransplanted chimeric retinas 89%
- A randomized, controlled, feasibility study of RD-X19 in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting 88%
- Contextualising Single-Arm Ophthalmology Trials With Real-World Data: An Emulated Target Trial Comparing The Efficacy Of Interventions For Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the Safety of Home Oximetry for Covid-19: A multi-site retrospective observational study 91%
- Developing a video expert panel as a reference standard to evaluate respiratory rate counting in paediatric pneumonia diagnosis: protocol for a cross-sectional study 91%
- Protocol for a prospective cohort study on the feasibility of application of nutritional ultrasound in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with nutritional risk at hospital discharge: Study on body composition and function (DRECO) 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.