Back

Prospective Multicenter Evaluation of the QuickNavi-Campylobacter Assay in Stool Specimens

Hatakeyama, S.; Hirose, Y.; Akashi, Y.; Kusama, T.; Ishimaru, N.; Morimoto, E.; Iwashima, S.; Suzuki, K.; Enomoto, K.; Suzuki, S.; Sekine, M.; Nishimura, T.; Terada, N.; Takahashi-Igari, M.; Abe, M.; Yamada, K.; Kato, D.; Ohkusu, K.; Suzuki, H.

2026-03-04 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.03.03.26346362 medRxiv
Show abstract

The rapid diagnosis of Campylobacter infections is important for the management of infectious gastroenteritis. Although stool culture is considered the gold standard, its sensitivity is limited and it requires prolonged incubation times. We performed a prospective multicenter study at nine healthcare facilities in Japan to evaluate a Campylobacter rapid antigen test using stool specimens between March 2024 and August 2025. Patients with suspected infectious gastroenteritis were consecutively enrolled and tested using QuickNavi-Campylobacter and compared with the FilmArray Gastrointestinal Panel as the reference method. Discordant results were further evaluated by culturing and additional PCR assays. In total, 410 patients were included in the final analysis. The positive, negative, and total concordance rates between QuickNavi-Campylobacter and FilmArray Gastrointestinal Panel were 79%, 99%, and 93%, respectively. The positive concordance rate decreased in specimens collected [≥] 6 days after the onset of symptoms (50%). QuickNavi-Campylobacter demonstrated relatively good concordance with the FilmArray Gastrointestinal Panel in a real-world multicenter setting. These results suggest that this rapid antigen test may be particularly useful for the early diagnosis of suspected campylobacteriosis.

Published in Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.