Back

Matrix viscoelasticity regulates dermal fibroblast activation in a three-dimensional fibrillar microenvironment

Gathman, G. M.; Patel, M. M.; Walter, D. I.; Stowers, R. S.

2026-03-04 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.03.02.709111 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeFibrosis is the pathological remodeling of the extracellular matrix (ECM) that is largely orchestrated by activated fibroblasts. The mechanical properties of the ECM change drastically during fibrosis, and fibroblasts become increasingly activated by mechanical environments that mimic the properties of fibrotic tissues. While the effects of increased elastic modulus (stiffness) on fibroblast activation have been well-studied, the impact of changes in viscoelasticity are less clear. Here, we sought to determine how fibroblast activation is altered by changes in viscoelasticity in a three-dimensional, fibrillar microenvironment. MethodsWe employed 3D alginate collagen I hydrogels with independently tunable stiffness and stress relaxation rates. Dermal fibroblasts were encapsulated in hydrogels with four distinct mechanical profiles (soft: 3 kPa or stiff: 10 kPa, fast stress relaxing: {tau}1/2 {approx} 160 s or slow stress relaxing: {tau}1/2 {approx} 1600 s). We assessed fibroblast activation by changes in cell morphology, expression of key activation markers, and evidence of ECM remodeling. ResultsFibrillar alginate collagen networks enhanced fibroblast spreading, -smooth muscle actin stress fiber formation, and fibroblast activation protein- expression in matrices that were slow relaxing or stiff. The presence of the fibrillar network further enhanced fibroblast activation, independent of the changes driven by matrix viscoelasticity. ECM remodeling was also promoted by slow relaxing matrices, with increased fibronectin deposition and more remodeling of the local collagen fiber network. ConclusionsOur results demonstrate that fibroblast activation is highly responsive to matrix stress relaxation rate, and that models incorporating fibrillar, viscoelastic networks can provide new insights into the role of ECM mechanics driving fibroblast activation.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.5%
2
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
3
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
4
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
6
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
8
Biomaterials Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
9
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
10
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.0%
12
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
13
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
15
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
16
Tissue Engineering Part A
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
18
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
19
Cytotherapy
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
20
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.2%
22
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
23
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
24
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
25
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%