Modelling the impact of long-acting monoclonal antibody, maternal vaccine and hybrid programs of RSV immunisation in temperate Western Australia
Giannini, F.; Hogan, A. B.; Blyth, C. C.; Glass, K.; Moore, H. C.
Show abstract
BackgroundTwo RSV immunisations products: a maternal vaccine, Abrysvo, and a long-acting monoclonal antibody, nirsevimab, both designed to prevent RSV illness in infants, have recently become available. Modelling evidence is required to inform how to optimally use these products in immunisation programs to reduce the burden of RSV in young children. MethodsWe extend a dynamic transmission model calibrated to RSV-hospitalisation data of children aged < 5 years in temperate Western Australia (WA) to simulate a range of potential RSV immunisation programs. Using our model, we estimate the impact of both single-product and hybrid RSV immunisation programs. The analysis considers timing of administration, coverage levels and targeting of high-risk groups. Impact on RSV burden is analysed in the context of the WA setting and the possible significant cost differences between the two products. ResultsAll programs analysed were effective in reducing RSV burden. Programs using nirsevimab for newborn infants at similar coverage levels to the Abrysvo programs, averted more RSV-hospitalisations annually. Seasonal programs that focused on protection during high RSV activity and programs targeting high-risk infants were the most efficient in reducing RSV burden. When dose cost is considered alongside program impact on RSV burden, we find evidence to support further economic analysis of hybrid programs as they could mitigate the cost differential between the two products while remaining highly effective in reducing RSV burden. ConclusionsOur study is the first to comprehensively analyse hybrid RSV immunisation programs that use Abrysvo and nirsevimab. RSV immunisation programs can substantially reduce the burden of RSV in young children. Our modelling analysis provides evidence on immunisation type, timing, coverage, high-risk groups and dosage cost that will support decision makers and can be used in economic evaluations.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Influential drivers of the cost-effectiveness of respiratory syncytial virus vaccination in European older adults: A multi-country analysis 96%
- Non-pharmaceutical interventions and vaccinating school children required to contain SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant outbreaks in Australia: a modelling analysis 95%
- Potential health and economic impact of paediatric vaccination using next generation influenza vaccines in Kenya: a modelling study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimizing next-generation RSV prevention in Mali: a cost-effectiveness analysis of pediatric vaccination, maternal vaccination, and extended half-life monoclonal antibody immunoprophylaxis 97%
- Rural prioritization may increase the impact of COVID-19 vaccines in Sub-Saharan Africa due to ongoing internal migration: A modeling study 94%
- Targeted vaccination is effective for mpox clade Ib in England despite increased household transmission: predictions from a modelling study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cost-Effectiveness of Prefusion F Protein-Based Vaccines Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus Disease for Older Adults in the United States 96%
- The impact of vaccination on COVID-19 outbreaks in the United States 94%
- Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccines in the HIVE household cohort over 8 years: is there evidence of indirect protection? 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.