Back

The minimum number of blood pressure measurements needed and thresholds for visit-to-visit blood pressure variability to predict cardiovascular disease in primary care patients

Lukitasari, M.; Argha, R.; Liaw, S.-T.; Jalaludin, B.; Rhee, J.; Jonnagaddala, J.

2026-03-04 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.03.02.26347458 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesVisit-to-visit blood pressure variability (VVV BPV) is an underutilised risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study aims to determine the minimum number of BP measurements needed and to identify cut-off values for the standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), and average real variability (ARV) of systolic and diastolic VVV BPV to predict CVD risk in primary care. MethodsWe analysed data from the electronic practice-based research network (ePBRN) in Southwestern Sydney, including patients aged 18-55 with at least eight BP readings. Patients with incomplete data or no follow-up beyond age 55 were excluded. The agreement between SD calculated from 3-5 measurements and 8 measurements (reference) was evaluated using Pearsons correlation coefficient and the intraclass correlation coefficient. Then, after identifying that a minimum of five BP measurements is needed, another cohort with at least five BP measurements was developed. Percentile-based cut-offs (10th - 90 th, 5-percentile increments) were derived for systolic and diastolic BPV (SD, CV, ARV). Predictive accuracy was assessed using the C-statistic. The outcome was the first CVD occurrence. ResultsA total of 1,549 patients were included in the first study. Five BP measurements showed good agreement with eight measurements (ICC: 0.79; correlation: 0.80). A total of 3,022 patients were included (55.2% women). Higher VVV BPV (SD, CV. ARV) was associated with increased CVD risk. Optimal cut-off values for systolic BP were 19 mmHg (SD), 14% (CV), and 15 mmHg (ARV), and for diastolic BP were 11 mmHg (SD), 12% (CV), and 11 mmHg (ARV). Predictive performance was consistent across time frames. ConclusionsThese BPV cut-offs provide clinically relevant thresholds for CVD risk prediction. At least five BP measurements are sufficient to estimate BPV for this purpose.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.3%
3
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.9%
5
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
6
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
8
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.5%
9
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
10
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
11
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
14
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
16
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
17
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
18
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
19
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.3%
20
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
21
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
22
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
23
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
24
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
25
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
26
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
27
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
28
Obesity
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
29
Hypertension
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
30
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%