Back

Genomic selection for seed yield enhances flax breeding efficiency

You, F. M.; Zheng, C.; Zagariah Daniel, J. J.; Li, P.; Jackle, K.; House, M.; Tar'an, B.; Cloutier, S.

2026-03-03 genomics
10.64898/2026.03.01.707406 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Genomic selection (GS) is a promising strategy to improve breeding efficiency for complex traits such as seed yield by enabling early selection and reducing reliance on extensive field testing. However, practical deployment of GS remains challenging due to limited training populations sizes and reduced prediction accuracies when models are applied to true breeding germplasm. In this study, we evaluated GS for flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) seed yield under realistic breeding scenarios, with a focus on across-population prediction (APP) and breeding decision support rather than model benchmarking. Using historical germplasm collections and a newly developed breeding-oriented population as training sets, GS performance was assessed across multiple independent test populations representing contemporary breeding lines evaluated in replicated yield trials. APP accuracies reached r = 0.84 when training and test populations were genetically aligned, supporting routine breeding deployment. Training population composition emerged as a key determinant of prediction success, with breeding-oriented populations consistently outperforming broad germplasm collections for predicting true breeding lines. Check-based selection analyses showed that GS reliably reproduced phenotypic advancement decisions while eliminating 61-91% of low-performing lines, resulting in 48-78% reduction in field evaluation costs for a typical cohort of 300 lines. Marker subsampling analyses further indicated that moderate-density genotyping-by-sequencing panels ([~]2,500-3,000 SNPs) are sufficient to achieve stable prediction accuracies. Overall, these results demonstrate that GS for seed yield in flax is ready for routine integration into breeding programs, offering a practical pathway to reduce costs, accelerate breeding cycles, and enhance selection efficiency.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
5
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
6
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
7
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
8
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
9
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
10
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
11
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
12
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
13
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
14
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
15
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
16
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
17
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
18
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
19
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
21
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
22
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
26
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
in silico Plants
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
28
Pest Management Science
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%