Making sleep behaviors interpretable: adapting the two-process model of sleep regulation to longitudinal Fitbit sleep and activity behaviors for health insights
Coleman, P.; Annis, J.; Master, H.; Gustavson, D. E.; Han, L.; Brittain, E.; Ruderfer, D. M.
Show abstract
BackgroundAs sleep data from wearable devices are increasingly available in health research, there are new opportunities to understand sleep regulation behaviors as modifiable risk factors for disease. At such a large scale (tens of thousands of people over millions of day-level observations), prioritizing and interpreting sleep behaviors is challenging while maintaining biological relevance and modifiability. In this work, we aim to address this challenge by proposing a framework to interpret Fitbit data through a well-known neurobiological framing of sleep regulation, the two-process model. MethodsWe use data from the All of Us Research Program, a national biobank with passively collected Fitbit data for 32,292 people across 15,754,893 total days. We map Fitbit behaviors (b) to either circadian (C) or homeostatic (S) processes. Using iterative exploratory factor analysis to obtain weights, the Fitbit Cb and Sb are then weighted at the level of each day to create Cb and Sb scores. FindingsCb and Sb scores were found to align with expected real-world relationships with age, seasonality, shift work, and napping. Cb and Sb scores were interpreted with relation to depression, where it was found that Sb scores are highly associated with likelihood of diagnosis (OR = 1.5, p < 2e-16) while Cb and Sb scores are equally associated with severity (Sb score {beta} = 0.2, Cb score {beta} = 0.21, p < 2e-16). InterpretationCb and Sb scores support longitudinal interpretation (e.g., changes in Sb around treatment), aggregation (e.g., differences in Cb between two groups), and actionable modification (e.g., reduce naps to improve poor Sb). Overall, our behavior scores allow for interpretation of wearables sleep data and can be utilized across many disease contexts to better understand how sleep influences health. FundingThis work was supported by NIH training grant T32GM145734 and NIH R21HL172038.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Engineering a Mobile Platform to Promote Sleep in the Pediatric Primary Care Setting 93%
- Age- and Sex-Related Differences in Sleep Patterns and Their Relations to Self-Reported Sleep and Mood 92%
- An integrative approach prioritizes the orphan GPR61 genomic region in tissue-specific regulation of chronotype 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Schizophrenia-associated variation at ZNF804A correlates with altered experience-dependent dynamics of sleep slow-waves and spindles in healthy young adults 94%
- Associations between brain structure and sleep patterns across adolescent development 94%
- The Aging Slow Wave: A Shifting Amalgam of Distinct Slow Wave and Spindle Coupling Subtypes Define Slow Wave Sleep Across the Human Lifespan 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- An EEG Signature of MCH Neuron Activities Predicts Cocaine Seeking 92%
- Insomnia subtypes have differentiating deviations in brain structural connectivity 92%
- Low-dose Perampanel rescues cortical gamma dysregulation associated with parvalbumin interneuron GluA2 upregulation in epileptic Syngap1+/- mice 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Temporal Trends in Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Sleep Duration in the United States, 2004–2018 93%
- Estimating the Burden of Influenza on Daily Activity at Population Scale Using Commercial Wearable Sensors 90%
- Dementia Risk and Machine Learning-Derived Brain Age Index from Sleep Electroencephalography: A Pooled Cohort Analysis of Over 7,000 Individuals Across Five Community Cohorts 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.