Back

Making sleep behaviors interpretable: adapting the two-process model of sleep regulation to longitudinal Fitbit sleep and activity behaviors for health insights

Coleman, P.; Annis, J.; Master, H.; Gustavson, D. E.; Han, L.; Brittain, E.; Ruderfer, D. M.

2026-03-03 health informatics
10.64898/2026.03.01.26347356 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAs sleep data from wearable devices are increasingly available in health research, there are new opportunities to understand sleep regulation behaviors as modifiable risk factors for disease. At such a large scale (tens of thousands of people over millions of day-level observations), prioritizing and interpreting sleep behaviors is challenging while maintaining biological relevance and modifiability. In this work, we aim to address this challenge by proposing a framework to interpret Fitbit data through a well-known neurobiological framing of sleep regulation, the two-process model. MethodsWe use data from the All of Us Research Program, a national biobank with passively collected Fitbit data for 32,292 people across 15,754,893 total days. We map Fitbit behaviors (b) to either circadian (C) or homeostatic (S) processes. Using iterative exploratory factor analysis to obtain weights, the Fitbit Cb and Sb are then weighted at the level of each day to create Cb and Sb scores. FindingsCb and Sb scores were found to align with expected real-world relationships with age, seasonality, shift work, and napping. Cb and Sb scores were interpreted with relation to depression, where it was found that Sb scores are highly associated with likelihood of diagnosis (OR = 1.5, p < 2e-16) while Cb and Sb scores are equally associated with severity (Sb score {beta} = 0.2, Cb score {beta} = 0.21, p < 2e-16). InterpretationCb and Sb scores support longitudinal interpretation (e.g., changes in Sb around treatment), aggregation (e.g., differences in Cb between two groups), and actionable modification (e.g., reduce naps to improve poor Sb). Overall, our behavior scores allow for interpretation of wearables sleep data and can be utilized across many disease contexts to better understand how sleep influences health. FundingThis work was supported by NIH training grant T32GM145734 and NIH R21HL172038.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Sleep Research
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.7%
2
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.4%
3
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.4%
4
Journal of Biological Rhythms
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
6
Sleep
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
7
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
8
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
9
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.7%
10
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.1%
11
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
12
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
13
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
17
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
18
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
19
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
21
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
27
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
28
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.8%
29
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
SLEEP
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%