Back

A process evaluation of a cluster randomised trial hosted in hairdressing salons promoting women's cardiovascular prevention

Barraclough, J. Y.; Ouyang, M.; Reading, M.; Woodward, M.; Rodgers, A.; Peiris, D.; Patel, A.; Neal, B.; Arnott, C.; Liu, H.

2026-03-02 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.03.01.26345507 medRxiv
Show abstract

AimTo outline the opportunities and barriers when using hairdressing salons as a novel site for enhancing cardiovascular risk factor assessment and management in women. MethodsA process evaluation nested within a cluster-randomised trial, Hairdressers for Health. The trial evaluated a nudge intervention advising women [≥]45years attending hairdressing salons to undertake a Heart Health Check with their General Practitioner. The UK Medical Research Council process evaluation framework was used to guide the design, data collection and analysis. Nineteen interviews were conducted with nine hairdressers, nine study participants and a project officer. Thematic analysis assessed recruitment, reach, acceptability, and adoption. Characteristics of the salons and participants were analysed using descriptive statistics. ResultsRecruitment of the planned 88 metropolitan and 28 regional salons for the trial was challenging, requiring resource-intensive face-to-face visits. The nudge intervention was well accepted by participants, and salons were perceived to be an appropriate setting to effectively reach women. Adoption of the study by salons was limited with only 54 of the 116 salons recruiting participants (total recruited 239, range 1-22 participants per salon). Barriers to participant recruitment included technological constraints while using a decentralised online recruitment and data collection platform, client preferences and privacy concerns. Established hairdresser-client relationships in smaller salons facilitated greater client participation and was perceived as a good mechanism for health promotion. ConclusionsCardiovascular health prevention messaging for women in salons was acceptable to hairdressers and clients. Designing the study to make better use of hairdresser-client personal relationships may have improved project implementation. Trial RegistrationACTRN12621001740886

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
26.3%
2
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
4
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.3%
6
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
7
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
8
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
9
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
10
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
11
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
12
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
13
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
14
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
15
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
16
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
17
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
18
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%