Back

Minimum Unique Substrings as a Context-Aware k-mer Alternative for Genomic Sequence Analysis

Adu, A. F.; Menkah, E. S.; Amoako-Yirenkyi, P.; Pandam Salifu, S.

2026-03-03 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.02.28.708734 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Fixed-length k-mers have long been the standard in sequence analysis. However, they impose a uniform resolution across heterogeneous genomes, often resulting in significant redundancy and a loss of contextual sensitivity. To address these limitations, we introduce Minimum Unique Substrings (MUSs), which are variable-length sequence units that adapt to the local complexity of the genome. MUSs function as context-aware markers that naturally define repeat boundaries by extending only until uniqueness is achieved. We build upon the theoretical relationship between MUSs and maximal repeats, extending this framework to sequencing reads by establishing a read-consistent definition of uniqueness. We present a linear-time ([O] (n)) algorithm based on a generalized suffix tree and introduce the concept of "outposts." These outposts act as anchors for uniqueness, enabling precise localization of MUS boundaries within the sequencing data. Empirical studies of E. coli K-12 and human HiFi reads reveal distinct distributions in MUS lengths that reflect their respective genomic architectures. The compact bacterial genome produces a highly dense set of MUSs with a narrow length distribution (averaging 30.44 bp). In contrast, the repeat-rich human genome requires longer substrings to resolve uniqueness, resulting in an increased mean length (36.08 bp) and a broader distribution that delineates complex repetitive elements. The MUS framework achieves 100% unique coverage with an average length of 36.08 bp, surpassing the 69% coverage of k = 61. By reducing the total number of tokens by over 99%, it provides higher resolution and superior data compression compared to fixed-length k-mer sampling. These results demonstrate that MUSs provide a biologically meaningful, context-sensitive alternative to k-mers, with direct applications in genome assembly, repeat characterization, and comparative genomics.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
10.7%
3
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.4%
4
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 4%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.5%
6
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.5%
7
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.5%
8
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.7%
9
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
10
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
11
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
12
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.5%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
14
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
15
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.1%
17
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.1%
18
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.1%
19
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
20
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.7%
21
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.7%
23
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
24
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%