Back

iGS: A Zero-Code Dual-Engine Graphical Software for Polygenic Trait Prediction

Zhang, J.; Chen, F.

2026-03-03 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.02.28.708730 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Genomic selection (GS) has become the core driving force in modern plant and animal breeding. However, state-of-the-art comprehensive GS tools often rely on complex underlying environment configurations and command-line operations, posing significant technical barriers for breeders lacking programming expertise. To address this critical pain point, this study developed a fully "zero-code" graphical user interface (GUI) decision support system for genomic selection. The platform innovatively employs a "portable dual-engine architecture" (R-Portable and Python-Portable) to achieve completely dependency-free, "out-of-the-box" deployment, and integrates a standardized six-step end-to-end workflow from data quality control to result export. Furthermore, the platform comprehensively integrates 33 cutting-edge prediction models across four major paradigms, linear, Bayesian, machine learning, and deep learning, and features an original intelligent parameter configuration system that dynamically renders algorithm parameters to provide a minimalist UI interaction experience. Benchmark testing on the Wheat2000 dataset across six complex agronomic and quality traits, including thousand-kernel weight (TKW) and grain protein content (PROT), demonstrated that classic linear models remain highly robust for polygenic additive traits, while tree-based machine learning and hybrid deep learning architectures exhibit superior predictive potential and noise resilience when resolving complex epistatic effects and low-heritability traits. The successful deployment of this platform fundamentally liberates biologists from the constraints of computational science, providing robust digital infrastructure to accelerate the popularization and practical application of GS technologies in agricultural production.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.1%
2
Plant Phenomics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
3
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
5
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
6
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.9%
10
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.8%
11
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
12
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
13
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
Molecular Plant
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
16
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
18
in silico Plants
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
19
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
20
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
21
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
22
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.7%
30
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%