Back

Echocardiographic features and nutritional status predict all-cause mortality among Malawian children with rheumatic heart disease

Olsen, J.; Chimzalizeni, Y.; Carapetis, J.; Chiume, M.; Gunter, S.; Hosseinipour, M.; Kazembe, P.; Lahiri, S.; Mkaliainga, T.; Murray, K.; Penny, D. J.; Tambala, T.; Vinnakota, A.; Sanyahumbi, A.

2026-03-04 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.02.28.26346960 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThis study of Malawian children with rheumatic heart disease (RHD) sought to detect demographic, clinical, and echocardiographic risk factors for mortality. MethodsPediatric patients with RHD were recruited from March to October, 2018 from clinic rosters and inpatient consults in Lilongwe and Blantyre, Malawi. An echocardiogram was performed upon study enrollment. Cox regression analyses were performed to assess for factors associated with mortality over nearly 2 years of follow-up. ResultsOf 118 patients, nearly two-thirds were female (64.4%) and median age was 12 (IQR 10-14). Just under half (47.0%) lived >40km from a tertiary care center. There was a high prevalence of severe mitral regurgitation (65.3%), and pericardial effusion was present in 18.6%. Nearly a quarter (23.7%) died during follow-up. In univariable Cox regression, living >40km from tertiary care, living in a remote area, moderate or severe malnutrition, taking a beta blocker, severe mitral stenosis, any severe valve disease, severe left atrial enlargement, and presence of a pericardial effusion were statistically significant risk factors for mortality (p<0.05). In the adjusted model, living >40km from tertiary care (HR 2.66, CI 1.06-6.07, p=0.037), malnutrition (mild HR 3.92, CI 1.03-14.91, p=0.045); moderate HR 7.41, CI 1.92-28.54, p=0.004; severe HR 4.91, CI 1.44-16.71, p=0.011), beta blocker use (HR 4.62, CI 1.63-13.10, p=0.004), and presence of a pericardial effusion (HR 6.96, CI 3.00-16.13, p<0.001) remained independent risk factors for mortality. ConclusionsThis study of Malawian children emphasizes the dire prognosis of RHD in under-resourced settings and provides potential area of focus for targeted intervention.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.5%
2
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
8.5%
3
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.9%
4
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.4%
6
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.4%
7
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
8
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
10
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.8%
11
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
12
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
13
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
15
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
16
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.5%
18
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
19
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
22
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
23
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
24
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
25
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
Rheumatology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
27
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
28
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
29
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
30
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%