Back

Modified Elek test improves in-vitro detection of diphtheria toxin

Badell-Ocando, E.; Bremont, S.; Barbet, M.; Passet, V.; Crestani, C.; Brisse, S.

2026-03-01 microbiology
10.64898/2026.02.27.708555 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeDiphtheria is caused by toxigenic strains of the Corynebacterium diphtheriae complex, mainly Corynebacterium diphtheriae and C. ulcerans. The diagnosis of diphtheria relies on detecting the diphtheria toxin (DT), for which Englers method of Eleks immunoprecipitation test is the gold standard. A recent optimization of Englers method was proposed by Melnikov and colleagues, showing higher sensitivity for C. ulcerans. The goal of our study was to test and adapt this optimized method, and to re-analyze apparent non-toxigenic tox gene bearing (NTTB) isolates from our collection. MethodsWe included 48 C. ulcerans, C. ramonii and C. diphtheriae isolates previously categorized as NTTB but for which no genetic explanation was found for the lack of DT expression. DT production was tested using Melnikovs method with further modifications made by us: i) increasing the antitoxin concentration; ii) using 5{degrees}C as the incubation temperature after 24h; and iii) modifying the layout of control and test strains on agar plates. Results35 of 38 C. ulcerans, 3 C. ramonii and 8 of 10 C. diphtheriae were found to be toxigenic. No genetic explanation was found regarding two non-toxigenic isolates (1 C. diphtheriae and 1 C. ulcerans), whereas for one C. diphtheriae, IS1132 was detected upstream of the tox gene. ConclusionOur modified implementation of Melnikovs Elek test improved our ability to detect diphtheria toxin production. Most isolates previously considered as NTTB but with no genetic explanation, were shown to be toxigenic using the novel method.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.4%
2
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
14.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.4%
5
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
6
Journal of Microbiological Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
8
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
9
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
10
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
11
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
12
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
13
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
14
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
15
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
16
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
17
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
21
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
23
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
24
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
25
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%