Back

Development of a microbiome based health score for non-invasive monitoring of farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)

Leon, L. E.; Lorca, C.; Fuentes, F.; Pina, A.; Ortuzar, M. I.; Gutierrez, D.; Ugalde, J.; Bisquertt, A.

2026-03-02 genomics
10.64898/2026.02.27.708536 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The sustainability of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) farming is threatened by infectious diseases, environmental stressors, feed limitations, and regulatory or economic constraints. Although current health monitoring is improving with AI-powered camera systems that analyze behavior and nutrition, these tools typically identify stress responses rather than early signs of disease states. Because the microbial community undergoes successional reassembly in response to physiological disruptions before host barriers are breached, the microbiome offers a proactive early warning approach. In this study, a comparative cohort design was employed using a total of 171 individuals (n= 85 "healthy"; n=86 "lesioned") collected from a commercial marine facility and classified based on external clinical signs. The microbiome of multiple body sites (gills, skin, urogenital pore, and mucosa) from healthy and lesioned salmon were profiled using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. No differences in alpha diversity were observed between tissues and conditions. However, beta diversity was significantly different in clinical status, and the interaction of tissue with the status. Conversely, the mucosa and urogenital microbiomes were compositionally similar to each other, as were the gill and skin microbiomes, suggesting that urogenital swabs could serve as a non-invasive proxy for gut microbiome profiling, and skin for gill microbiomes. Several supervised models were trained on these profiles and used to classify salmon status with high accuracy. Based on these data, two Salmon Microbiome Health Score were developed that accurately differentiated the two cohorts. These scores are proposed as a novel biomarker, enabling proactive health management in aquaculture and complementing emerging technological monitoring systems.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.5%
2
Animal Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
3
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
4
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
6
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
7
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.3%
8
Aquaculture
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
9
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
10
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
11
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
12
International Journal of Food Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
13
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
14
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Microbiology Resource Announcements
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
18
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
20
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
22
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
24
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
26
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
Physiological Genomics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
28
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
29
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%