Back

Virtual Population to Re-assess AAA Risk Using Neck Geometry and Shape Compactness Alongside Maximum Diameter

Nandurdikar, V.; Tyagi, A.; Canchi, T.; Frangi, A.; Revell, A.; Harish, A. B.

2026-03-02 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.02.27.708461 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We present an automated framework to generate 1 demographically stratified virtual populations of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and to quantify anatomy-flow relationships via an in silico observational study. Using 258 CTA-derived cases, we generated 182 validated AAA geometries and ran 364 simulations, extracting 11 geometric descriptors and six haemodynamic biomarkers. The automated constraint-aware framework blends statistically grounded sampling, anatomical plausibility and regional morphing to provide a scalable route for reproducible CFD to uncover geometry-biomarker relations at cohort scale. The proximal neck diameter was the strongest determinant of shear, increasing mean WSS (r {approx} 0.77) and peak WSS0.95(r {approx} 0.58) while reducing low-TAWSS area (r {approx} -0.36). Maximum diameter minimally affected peak shear (r {approx} -0.03) but led to moderate increase of low-TAWSS regions (r {approx} +0.20). Compactness indices suppressed oscillatory shear; sphericity and convexity, largely under-explored AAA shape descriptors, showed strong inverse correlation with OSI (r {approx} -0.68, -0.65) and mean WSS (r {approx} -0.47, -0.59). The framework reveals neck calibre and shape compactness, not maximum diameter alone, as dominant modulators of AAA haemodynamics. Subject Areasfluid mechanics, biomechanics, biomedical engineering

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.5%
2
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
4
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
5
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.4%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.3%
7
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
8
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
9
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
10
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
12
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.9%
13
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
14
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
15
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
16
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
19
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
20
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.8%
26
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.6%
28
Interface Focus
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
29
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.5%
30
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%