Predicting visual function before glaucoma onset from baseline optical coherence tomography scans using deep learning
Chaurasia, A. K.; Wang, C.; Toohey, P. W.; Chen, C. Y.; MacGregor, S.; Bennett, M. T.; Verma, N.; Craig, J. E.; McCartney, P. J.; Sarossy, M. G.; Hewitt, A. W.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe visual field (VF) test results of many eyes with glaucoma progress despite treatment. This suggests that some eyes are either untreated or that the management of intraocular pressure (IOP) does not influence the outcome. In this work, we explore whether future VF parameters can be predicted from a baseline optical coherence retinal nerve fibre layer (OCT-RNFL) scan using a deep learning model. MethodsThe model was developed using 1792 eyes from 1610 patients, and externally validated on 151 eyes from a second centre using the same Zeiss Cirrus machine and 281 eyes from a third centre using scans obtained from a different (Heidelberg Spectralis) machine. The Vision Transformers (ViT)-based regression model was trained on baseline OCT-RNFL scans to predict three key VF indices (follow-up interval: 4.74 {+/-} 2.59 years). Model performance was evaluated using Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), with 95% confidence intervals (CI). ResultsThe model achieved an overall MAE of 2.07 (95% CI: 1.91-2.22) and RMSE of 2.87 (95% CI: 2.60-3.14) on the internal validation set. On external validation, the model showed comparable performance with an MAE of 2.07 (95% CI: 1.8-2.35) for the external validation (Zeiss OCT) cohort and 2.11 (95% CI: 1.93-2.31) for the external validation (Heidelberg OCT) cohort. Saliency maps revealed that the inner and outer RNFL layers were key structures in driving the models predictions. ConclusionsOur ViT-based regression model effectively predicts key VF indices objectively from a single OCT-RNFL scan, with strong performance across two OCT devices, offering a novel tool for predicting glaucoma progression.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Rates of Glaucoma Progression Derived from Linear Mixed Models Using Varied Random Effect Distributions 97%
- Relating Standardized Automated Perimetry Performed with Stimulus Sizes III and V in Eyes With Field Loss due to Glaucoma and NAION 97%
- Reliability of retinal pathology quantification in age-related macular degeneration: Implications for clinical trials and machine learning applications 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Autonomous screening for Diabetic Macular Edema using deep learning processing of retinal images 97%
- Artificial intelligence to facilitate clinical trial recruitment in age-related macular degeneration 95%
- Quantification of Fundus Autofluorescence Features in a Molecularly Characterized Cohort of More Than 3500 Inherited Retinal Disease Patients from the United Kingdom 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated Expert-level Scleral Spur Detection and Quantitative Biometric Analysis on the ANTERION Anterior Segment OCT System 97%
- Macula structural and vascular differences in glaucoma eyes with and without high axial myopia 96%
- Evaluation of the Nallasamy Formula: A Stacking Ensemble Machine Learning Method for Refraction Prediction in Cataract Surgery 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal in vivo changes in radial peripapillary capillaries and optic nerve head structure in non-human primates with early experimental glaucoma 96%
- Potential Structural Biomarkers in 3D Images Validated by the First Functional Biomarker for Early Age-Related Macular Degeneration - ALSTAR2 Baseline 95%
- U-shaped effect of blood pressure on structural OCT metrics and retinal blood flow autoregulation in ophthalmologically healthy subjects 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.