Back

Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake in Africa: A Multi-Country Analysis of WHO STEPS Data, 2014-2019

Mulenga, E.; Ng'ambi, W.; Chigere, A.; Mutasha, S.; Zyambo, C.

2026-03-02 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.02.27.26347296 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCervical cancer remains a significant global public health challenge, with the overwhelming majority of its burden borne by low- and middle-income countries. Globally, an estimated 660,000 new cases and 350,000 deaths occur each year, with more than 90% of cervical cancer-related mortality concentrated in resource-limited settings. In Africa, limited access to organized screening programs and early detection services continues to contribute to persistently high incidence and mortality rates, despite the preventable nature of the disease. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional analysis of WHO STEPwise (STEPS) survey data collected between 2014 and 2019 from 11 African countries. The analysis included 25,471 women aged 15 years and older. Weighted prevalence estimates were calculated, and multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to identify factors associated with ever having been screened for cervical cancer. Predicted probabilities were estimated and stratified by age and residence. ResultsThe pooled prevalence of cervical cancer screening uptake was approximately 10.0%. Uptake was consistently higher among urban women than rural women across all age groups. In adjusted analyses, screening uptake increased strongly with age, peaking at 50-54 years (AOR = 8.21; 95% CI: 5.55-12.14). Higher education showed a clear positive gradient, with tertiary education associated with more than threefold higher odds compared with no education (AOR = 3.20; 95% CI: 2.65-3.86). Urban residence was associated with higher uptake (AOR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.11-1.34). Substantial cross-country variation was observed, with higher odds in Botswana (AOR = 6.58; 95% CI: 5.51-7.86) and markedly lower odds in Benin (AOR = 0.08; 95% CI: 0.05-0.14). Hypertension was positively associated with screening uptake, while low fruit and vegetable intake were inversely associated. ConclusionsCervical cancer screening uptake in Africa remains critically low and unevenly distributed. Addressing age, educational, urban-rural, and country-level disparities is essential to achieving WHO elimination targets.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
3
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.8%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 37%
4.0%
5
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.0%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
7
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
9
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
10
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
11
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
12
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
13
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
15
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
16
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
24
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
25
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
27
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
28
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%