Back

NT-proBNP Thresholds for Early Heart Failure Detection in Asian Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

Lai, T.-S.; Tseng, C.-L.; Wu, C.-K.; Chiang, L.-T.; Chen, Y.-C.; Hsu, W.-L.

2026-03-03 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.02.27.26347295 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundHeart failure (HF) is an increasingly common complication among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), yet its early detection remains challenging, especially in those with concomitant chronic kidney disease (CKD). NT-proBNP is a key biomarker for diagnosing and prognosticating HF, but its reference thresholds are influenced by renal function, age, and ethnicity. Current guideline cutoffs, largely derived from Western populations, may not apply to Asian patients. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included 10,587 adults with T2D who underwent NT-proBNP testing between 2006 and 2021 at the National Taiwan University Hospital. Patients with prior HF were excluded. Generalized additive models identified NT-proBNP thresholds associated with HF hospitalization, and Kaplan-Meier analysis validated outcome separation. Subgroup analyses were stratified by age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). ResultsDuring a mean follow-up of 3.5 years, 1,892 (17.9%) patients were hospitalized for HF. NT-proBNP levels of 179 pg/mL (outpatient) and 728 pg/mL (emergency) marked inflection points for rising event risk (log-rank p < 0.0001). Age-specific analyses showed progressive increases in optimal thresholds: from 85 (<50 years old), 150 (50-74 years old) and 290 pg/mL ([&ge;]75 years old) in outpatients, and from 310, 600 and 1,165 pg/mL, respectively, in emergency settings. In the BMI-stratified analysis, NT-proBNP thresholds demonstrated an inverse relation with BMI. Considering renal function, the optimal cutoffs were 100, 310, and 935 pg/mL for eGFR > 60, 30-60, and < 30 mL/min/1.73 m{superscript 2}, respectively; in the emergency cohort, the corresponding thresholds were 290, 835, and 3,905 pg/mL. ConclusionsThis large Asian cohort defines setting- and renal function-specific NT-proBNP thresholds for predicting HF hospitalization in patients with T2D. The lower optimal cutoffs compared with Western guidelines highlight the need for ethnicity-adjusted diagnostic criteria to improve early identification and risk stratification of HF in clinical practice. What is new?O_LIIn a large real-world Asian cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes, we identified setting-specific NT-proBNP thresholds (179 pg/mL outpatient; 728 pg/mL emergency) associated with heart failure hospitalization risk. C_LIO_LIAge-, BMI-, and kidney function-stratified cutoffs revealed substantial heterogeneity in optimal NT-proBNP thresholds. C_LIO_LICompared with guideline-recommended values, Asian-specific thresholds were consistently lower ([~]30-40%), supporting ethnic differences in natriuretic peptide biology. C_LIO_LIA generalized additive model (GAM) captured nonlinear biomarker-risk relationships, enabling data-driven and clinically interpretable cutoff identification. C_LI What are the clinical implications?O_LIUse of ethnicity- and context-specific NT-proBNP thresholds may improve early detection of heart failure in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes. C_LIO_LIIncorporating kidney function and BMI into NT-proBNP interpretation enhances risk stratification, particularly in patients with CKD. C_LIO_LIReliance on Western guideline cutoffs may underestimate heart failure risk in Asian populations. C_LIO_LIThese findings support a precision medicine approach to biomarker interpretation and highlight the need for population-specific guideline refinement. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
2
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.5%
3
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
6
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.4%
7
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.3%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
10
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.9%
11
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
12
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
15
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
16
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
19
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
20
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
52 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
24
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
28
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
30
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%