Back

Tetracycline-Regulated Inducible CB2 Expression in AtT20 Cells: A Functional Assay for Quantifying Ligand Efficacy

Foyzun, T.; Connor, M.; Zaman, H.; Kassiou, M.; Kallinen, A.; Santiago, M.

2026-03-02 pharmacology and toxicology
10.64898/2026.02.26.708391 bioRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionCannabinoid receptor-2 (CB2) is an emerging therapeutic target for chronic and inflammatory pain, cancer, and neurological disorders. Understanding the efficacy of CB2 ligands is crucial for future drug design and development. AimsWe aimed to establish a simple and robust system to control CB2 expression using a tetracycline-regulated mammalian expression system (T-REx), to enable application of the Black and Leff operational model to measure the operational efficacy ({tau}) of CB2 ligands. MethodsLigand-induced hyperpolarisation of AtT20 cells transfected with T-REx and human CB2 was measured by FLIPR membrane potential assay. Maximal and submaximal responses of the CB2 ligands were produced by regulating CB2 expression using tetracycline. Data were fitted to the operational model of receptor depletion to quantify the efficacy of seven ligands. Additionally, the maximal initial rate of signalling (IRmax), another putative measure of ligand efficacy, was determined. ResultsAK-F-064, CP55940 and 2-AG exhibited similar efficacy with a {tau} values of 11.4, 11 and 10.4 respectively, while anandamide (AEA) had the lowest efficacy ({tau}=1.07) among the tested agonists. The rank order of operational efficacy and IRmax was similar and was estimated as: AK-F-064 = CP55940 = 2-AG > 5F-AB-PICA = WIN55212-2 > HU-308 = AEA. ConclusionThis inducible expression system provides a reliable platform for quantifying and comparing CB2 ligand efficacy using the operational model. This approach may facilitate more precise CB2-targeted drug development and can be readily extended to other GPCR targets.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
52.9%
50% of probability mass above
2
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
British Journal of Pharmacology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.0%
5
Pharmaceuticals
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
6
Biochemical Pharmacology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
8
Neuropharmacology
60 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
9
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
10
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
11
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
12
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
13
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
14
Molecular Pharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
15
Pharmaceutics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
16
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
17
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
19
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
20
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
21
Molecules
37 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
22
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%