Back

Arborist: Prioritizing Bulk DNA Inferred Tumor Phylogenies via Low-pass Single-cell DNA Sequencing Data

Weber, L. L.; Ching, C. Y.; Ly, C.; Pan, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Gao, C.; Van Loo, P.

2026-02-28 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.02.26.707773 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cancer arises from an evolutionary process that can be reconstructed from DNA sequencing and modeled by tumor phylogenies. High coverage bulk DNA sequencing (bulk DNA-seq) is widely available, but tumor phylogeny inference requires deconvolution, often resulting in non-uniqueness in the solution space. Single-cell DNA sequencing (scDNA-seq) holds potential to yield higher resolution tumor phylogenies, but the sparsity of emerging low-pass sequencing technologies poses challenges for the study of single-nucleotide variants. Increasing availability of data sequenced with both modalities provides an opportunity to capitalize on the advantages of these technologies. While inference methods exist for bulk DNA-seq and for low-pass scDNA-seq, no joint inference methods currently exist. As a first step, we propose a method named ARBORIST that prioritizes tumor phylogenies inferred via bulk DNA-seq using low-pass scDNA-seq data. ARBORIST takes as input a candidate set of trees with corresponding SNV clustering, along with variant and total read count data from scDNA-seq and uses variational inference to approximate a lower bound on the marginal likelihood of each tree in the candidate set. On simulated data, matching characteristics of current scDNA-seq data, ARBORIST outperforms both bulk and low-pass single-cell reconstruction methods. On a biological dataset, ARBORIST conclusively resolves the evolutionary relationship between different SNV clusters on a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, which is supported by orthogonal validation via a proxy for copy number. ARBORIST provides a principled framework for integrating bulk DNA-seq and low-pass scDNA-seq data, improving confidence in tumor phylogeny reconstruction. Availabilityhttps://github.com/VanLoo-lab/Arborist

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.