PHARMWATCH: A Multilayer Pharmacogenomics Safety System for Accurate Star Allele Interpretation
Eisenhart, C. E.; Brickey, R.; Mewton, J.
Show abstract
The Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) bases its drug-gene recommendations on the assignment of star alleles, which map known genotypes to defined functional categories and corresponding drug dosage guidelines. The star allele framework, first proposed in 1996 for the CYP gene family and later formalized with CPICs establishment in 2010 [1, 2], remains foundational to pharmacogenomics. However, this system has notable limitations. Its dependence on a restricted set of benchmark single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) excludes rare or novel pathogenic variants that can invalidate a star allele call and lead to incorrect dosing recommendations. Furthermore, nearby non-pathogenic variants can interfere with haplotype interpretation, introducing additional risk of misclassification. To address these gaps, we developed PHARMWATCH, a multistep pharmacogenomics workflow for comprehensive variant analysis, allele tracking, and contextual interpretation. PHARMWATCH incorporates two algorithmic safeguards designed to identify genomic alterations that compromise star allele accuracy: (1) de novo germline variant screening using the ACMG-based BIAS-2015 classifier and (2) variant interpretation in context (VIIC) to validate the functional integrity of star allele-defining SNPs [3]. Together, these layers enhance the reliability of pharmacogenomic reporting, enabling safe, automated, and review-ready recommendations that extend beyond the constraints of traditional star allele-based approaches.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Recommendations for application of the functional evidence PS3/BS3 criterion using the ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation framework 93%
- From Text to Translation: Using Language Models to Prioritize Variants for Clinical Review 92%
- OncoGEMINI: Software for Investigating Tumor Variants From Multiple Biopsies With Integrated Cancer Annotations 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validating data from Multiplex Assays of Variant Effect (MAVEs): A CanVIG-UK National Survey of NHS Clinical Scientists 93%
- Evidence-based calibration of computational tools for missense variant pathogenicity classification and ClinGen recommendations for clinical use of PP3/BP4 criteria 93%
- Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.