Back

Hypanus brevis: a newly resurrected Eastern South Pacific stingray lineage revealed by integrative taxonomy

Marin, A.; Zavalaga, F.; Gozzer-Wuest, R.; Santos-Rojas, L. E.; Reyes-Flores, L. E.; Alfaro, R.; Bearez, P.; Zelada-Mazmela, E.

2026-02-27 genetics
10.64898/2026.02.25.708098 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Hypanus brevis (Garman, 1880) and Hypanus dipterurus (Jordan & Gilbert, 1880) are currently considered as a conspecific lineage of the "diamond stingray" from the Eastern Pacific. This taxonomic group has been the subject of nomenclatural disputes for about 145 years. To clarify the historical confusion surrounding this lineage, we employed an integrative taxonomic approach using specimens from the Eastern North and Eastern South Pacific (ENP and ESP). The genetic results, based on single and multilocus mitochondrial analyses, revealed a distinct evolutionary unit in the ESP. While morphological analyses detected subtle differences between ENP and ESP specimens, most characters exhibited significant overlap (e.g., disc shape, dentition patterns, body coloration), suggesting low evolutionary divergence. A calibrated molecular clock analysis estimated this divergence at approximately 3.09 Ma. In accordance with Garmans (1880) original description based on specimens from Paita (northern Peru), we formally resurrect H. brevis from synonymy with H. dipterurus. Our findings suggest an anti-tropical speciation pathway, with core populations of H. brevis and H. dipterurus restricted to the temperate waters of the ESP and ENP, respectively. Notably, a single, fixed COI haplotype was detected in all H. brevis specimens from the north-central Peruvian coast. This result may indicate a severe bottleneck event, raising concerns about the genetic health and long-term viability of this vulnerable species. Finally, we analyzed historical fishery data of H. brevis to infer its current population status, suggesting targeted conservation measures and precautionary management to prevent further loss of genetic diversity.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 10%
17.7%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.2%
3
Journal of Fish Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
4
Aquaculture
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
9
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
10
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.4%
11
Hydrobiologia
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
13
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
14
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Acta Tropica
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
21
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
22
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
23
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
24
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
26
Journal of Heredity
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
27
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
28
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
29
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
30
FACETS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%