Back

Mapping the North American Terrestrial Carbon Cycle: A Process-based Reanalysis Using State Data Assimilation (SDA)

Zhang, D.; Huggins, J.; Li, Q.; Ramachandran, S.; Serbin, S.; Webb, C.; Zuo, Z.; Dietze, M. C.

2026-02-26 ecology
10.64898/2026.02.25.708030 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AbstractThe ability to accurately assess ecosystem C budgets across scales from individual sites to continents is essential for C accounting, management, and ultimately mitigating climate change. State data assimilation (SDA) provides a framework for harmonizing observations with models, while robustly accounting for and reducing multiple sources of uncertainty. In this study, we employed a hybrid SDA framework that combines process-based terrestrial biosphere modeling, hierarchical Bayesian inference, and machine learning to harmonize bottom-up and remotely-sensed data streams for 8,000 pre-selected 1km2 locations across North America within a hybrid structure. Combining bottom-up soils data (SoilGrids) with spectral (MODIS and Landsat) and microwave (SMAP) remote sensing helps constrain the major C and water stocks through space and time. Machine learning is used both to identify and correct systematic errors in the process model (SIPNET) and to interpolate the pre-selected locations onto a 1km grid, making it computationally feasible to generate annual ensemble maps of the North American carbon budget. Furthermore, the uncertainties for each variable were reduced compared to those from observations or models alone. Spatiotemporal analysis showed a slight decrease in aboveground biomass (AGB) across the western US, a loss of leaf area across the boreal, and a slight greening of the Alaskan tundra. The uncertainty trends suggest a significant reduction in the uncertainty about soil organic carbon (SOC), the largest C reservoir. Validation results show that we accurately estimate C pools, compared to the assimilated data streams and held-out observations of AGB from GEDI, ICESat-2, and the US FIA, and SOC from the ISCN network. Our ML-debiasing algorithm further improved the accuracy of major C pools (AGB, SOC). In general, our continental SDA framework will facilitate global C MRV (monitoring, reporting, and verification) by providing accurate and precise C-cycle estimates, along with their corresponding spatiotemporal uncertainties.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.0%
3
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.4%
5
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
6
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
7
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.4%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
10
GeoHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
11
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
12
Data in Brief
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
13
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
14
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
15
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
17
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
18
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
19
Journal of Thermal Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
20
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%
24
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.7%
25
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
26
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 49%
0.5%