Back

Towards Translational Sleep Staging: A Cross-Species Deep-Learning Model for Rodent and Human EEG

Chybowski, B.; Gonzalez-Sulser, A.; Escudero, J.

2026-02-26 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.02.25.707936 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Study ObjectivesAutomated sleep staging underpins clinical sleep assessment and translational neuroscience, yet most data analyses work addresses human and animal data separately. We tested whether a seizure-oriented machine learning framework can be repurposed for three-state sleep staging in humans and rats, and whether models trained solely on rodent data can be applied directly to human recordings using an explicit cross-species montage. MethodsWe used the PySeizure, a standardised EEG preprocessing and seizure-detection framework, together with TinySleepNet as the core classifier. Models were trained and evaluated on the Sleep-EDF expanded Sleep Cassette subset (three classes: wake, non-rapid eye movement sleep, rapid eye movement sleep), then applied without fine-tuning to the Sleep Telemetry subset. The same pipeline was used on a SYNGAP1 rat dataset with analogous three-state labels. A novel human-rat electroencephalography montage mapped rat electrodes to putative human scalp homologues, enabling direct application of rat-trained models to Sleep Cassette. ResultsWithin Sleep Cassette, the accuracy in three-stage sleep classification was 0.95. Applying this model directly to Sleep Telemetry yielded an accuracy of 0.89. On the rodent dataset, accuracy was 0.78. When the rat-trained model was applied directly to Sleep Cassette, accuracy was 0.68. ConclusionsA single deep learning pipeline can support robust three-state sleep staging in humans and rodents and retains meaningful performance under both human cross-subset and rat-to-human transfer without any retraining or fine-tuning. The rat-trained models above-chance performance on human data, achieved without human training samples, shows that rodent-derived representations can contribute directly to human sleep staging when constrained by an anatomically informed montage, linking preclinical rodent recordings and clinical human sleep studies.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
SLEEP
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.3%
2
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.1%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
5
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.1%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
7
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Sleep
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
9
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
10
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
11
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.6%
14
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
15
Journal of Sleep Research
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
16
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
17
Sleep Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
18
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
19
Journal of Neuroscience Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
20
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
21
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.2%
23
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
24
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
25
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
27
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 45%
0.7%
29
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%