Back

Estimating Plasmodium falciparum Parasite Rate using Test Positivity Rate from 2016-2024: Health Management Information Systems in Uganda

Okiring, J.; Rek, J.; Carter, A. R.; Nakakawa, J. N.; Mbabazi, D.; Eganyu, T.; Rutayisire, M.; Sebuguzi, C. M.; Mbaka, P.; Opigo, J.; Echodu, D.; Smith, D. L.; Hergott, D. E. B.

2026-02-27 public and global health
10.64898/2026.02.25.26347098 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMalaria transmission in Uganda is heterogenous, so the national malaria program needs information about the distribution of malaria to develop appropriate policies. While population-based community surveys estimate Plasmodium falciparum parasite rate (PfPR), they are too infrequent and sparse for routine malaria management. Health facility data is routinely collected and covers a large geographic scope, but the data is collected passively, variable in quality, and potentially highly biased. We aimed to triangulate test positivity rate (TPR) from health facility data to survey estimated PfPR data in Uganda to create monthly, high-resolution PfPR estimates. MethodsUsing matched health facility and survey data, we fit a multi-level logistic regression model that accounted for clustering at the district and region level, to predict PfPR from TPR. Additional covariates were explored to select a final model that reduced bias while prioritizing its utility for programmatic tasks. Model predictions were validated against observed PfPR and used to generate monthly district-level prevalence estimates from 2016 to 2024. Regional and national level estimates were made by weighting district level estimates by population. ResultsThe final model included a smoothed TPR term and proportion of severe malaria cases at a district-month level. Predicted PfPR was strongly positively correlated with the observed survey PfPR (Pearsons rank correlation rho =0.79, p<0.001). National estimates derived from predicted PfPR aligned well with survey estimates from the same time and area. ConclusionHealth Management Information System (HMIS) data, when paired with research data, can be used to estimate malaria prevalence with high spatial and temporal resolution. Estimates can be tested and models can be updated to help malaria programs best leverage facility data. In the context of declining survey frequency, HMIS-based modeling offers a resilient and cost-effective alternative for malaria surveillance and programmatic decision-making in Uganda and similar high-burden settings.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Malaria Journal
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.1%
2
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
3
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
9.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.5%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.4%
6
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.5%
8
Tropical Medicine & International Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
9
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
11
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
14
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
15
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
16
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
17
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
18
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
20
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
21
Parasites & Vectors
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%