Back

A norm-anchored framework for characterizing cognitive heterogeneity in schizophrenia

Chen, C.

2026-02-27 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.02.25.26347062 medRxiv
Show abstract

Cognitive heterogeneity is a core feature of schizophrenia (SCZ). Conventional approaches examine this heterogeneity using domain-specific scores, which may not fully reflect the underlying cognitive structure. In this study, a norm-anchored cognitive structural deviation (NCSD) framework was developed to examine such heterogeneity from a structure-informed perspective. The HC-derived latent cognitive structure (N-LCS) captured performance across the assessed tasks and remained stable under external validation in an independent cohort. Patients with SCZ showed greater global deviation from the N-LCS, along with altered loading directions of Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST)-derived executive indicators which were consistent across robustness analyses, and altered correlation patterns among cognitive measures relative to HC. These features were quantified using three NCSD-derived indices: the cognitive normative deviation index (CNDI), loading pattern divergence (LPD), and correlation structure discrepancy (CSD). CNDI discriminated SCZ from HC with stable performance under cross-validation. LPD and CSD were associated with anxiety ratings, with LPD also showing a trend-level association with positive symptoms. Exploratory clustering identified a three-cluster solution with clear separation and moderate stability. Together, these findings show that cognitive heterogeneity in SCZ involves both global deviation from the N-LCS and structural alteration. NCSD provides a refined framework to characterize such heterogeneity and may inform precision psychiatry and functional recovery.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.