Back

Hyperspectral Remote Sensing for Harmful Algal Bloom Detection: Pseudo-nitzschia in the Northeast Pacific

Bailess, A.; Baetge, N.; Barnard, A.; Tufillaro, N.; Behrenfeld, M.; Bill, B.; Kudela, R.; Graff, J.; Kavanaugh, M.

2026-02-26 ecology
10.64898/2026.02.24.707776 bioRxiv
Show abstract

1Diatoms are microscopic marine algae that are critical for global primary production, carbon sequestration, and fisheries productivity. However, select diatoms may form harmful algal blooms, which threaten marine ecosystems and the fisheries they sustain. Rapidly identifying harmful blooms is necessary to effectively manage marine resources, yet current identification methods are limited by expensive and labor-intensive in situ point sampling. Hyperspectral remote sensing enables scalable monitoring, but its ability to resolve taxonomic shifts within phytoplankton groups (e.g. diatoms) is largely unknown. To investigate this uncertainty, we cultured four dominant diatom genera from the California Current upwelling system, including this systems most abundant harmful algae, Pseudo-nitzschia. The hyperspectral absorption and backscatter of these taxa were measured and used to model spectral reflectances that remote sensing platforms (satellites/drones) might detect. Differences between fingerprints of these taxa were quantified using vector-based and statistical analyses. Mean spectral differences of 48% were observed between the most dominant diatom, Thalassiosira, and the most toxic diatom, Pseudo-nitzschia. Differences of approximately 30% were found between Pseudo-nitzschia and the second and third most abundant diatoms, Chaetoceros and Asterionellopsis. Successful identification of Pseudo-nitzschias reflectance fingerprint was driven by the presence of a unique feature around 560 nm. The distinct spectral fingerprint of Pseudo-nitzschia indicates that it can be distinguished from benign diatom blooms using hyperspectral remote sensing platforms.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
10.1%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.1%
4
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.8%
5
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
8
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
9
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
10
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
11
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
13
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
14
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
16
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
Limnology and Oceanography
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
18
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
19
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
Algal Research
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
Journal of Phycology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
26
Hydrobiologia
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
27
Aquaculture
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
28
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
30
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%