Back

BARTsc identifies key transcriptional regulators from single-cell omics data

Zhang, H.; Kang, L.; Wang, J.; Liang, K. P.; Wang, Z.; Xu, K.; Zang, C.

2026-02-25 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.02.24.707729 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Inference of transcriptional regulatory mechanisms from single-cell (sc) omics data, such as scRNA-seq, scATAC-seq, and scMultiome, remains an important problem in single-cell biology and functional genomics. Most existing methods for predicting functional transcriptional regulators (TRs) from single-cell data rely on co-expression between regulator and target genes and/or sequence motif enrichment, holding inherent limitations. Here, we present BARTsc, a computational method that accurately predicts functional TRs from clustered single-cell omics data by leveraging a large collection of public ChIP-seq profiles. BARTsc implements a novel framework to infer a cis-regulatory profile from differential genomic features from either unimodal (RNA or ATAC) or bimodal (scMultiome) single-cell profiling data and identify TRs whose binding profiles most associate with the cis-regulatory profile. BARTsc can quantify TR activity across cell clusters and predict key regulators for each cell cluster. We demonstrate that BARTsc can successfully identify active TRs in each cell type and cell-type-defining key regulators across diverse biological systems, including mouse cortex, human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), and human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Using a generative-AI-assisted, literature-supported collection of cell-type key regulators as benchmarks, we show that BARTsc consistently outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods. We apply BARTsc to identify critical regulators in PDAC, including NEFLA, a novel PDAC key regulator, and validate its function in pancreatic tumor proliferation by experiments. As a robust and versatile computational method, BARTsc provides deeper insights into cell-type-specific regulatory programs, facilitating the discovery of key regulators across diverse biological systems.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
2
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
14.2%
3
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.0%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.8%
5
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
7
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.6%
9
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
10
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
11
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
12
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.1%
13
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.3%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.3%
18
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
21
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
22
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
24
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
26
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
28
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.6%