Evaluating mainstreaming in pediatric immunology: an optimal model of care
DeBortoli, E.; Clinch, T.; Vaz-Goncalves, L.; Burbury, L.; Jeppesen, M.; Pinzon Charry, A.; Melo, M.; Sullivan, A.; Hunter, M.; Peake, J.; McInerney-Leo, A.; McNaughton, P.; Yanes, T.
Show abstract
PurposeWhile genomic testing is integral to pediatric inborn errors of immunity (IEI) care, few studies have examined strategies to support its optimal delivery. This study aimed to characterize a pediatric IEI cohort and assess the impact of implementing a mainstream model-of-care (MoC). Materials/MethodsComprehensive chart audit was conducted for patients ([≤]18y) who received IEI genomic testing in Queensland, Australia, from 2017-2025. Descriptive analyses captured demographic and clinical characteristics, genomic testing and results, and management outcomes. Inferential analyses assessed changes in genomic practices pre-MoC (<2021) and post-MoC ([≥]2021). Results322 patients met eligibility criteria (n=481 genomic test). Diagnostic yield (27.6%) varied by testing indication, with the highest rate among phagocytic defects (n=4/4;100%) and severe combined immunodeficiency (n=8/10;80%). Very-early-onset inflammatory bowel disease had the lowest diagnostic yield (n=3/68;4.4%), prompting changes to testing criteria. Molecular diagnosis resulted in management changes for 90.5% patients. Genomic testing was widely used pre-MoC (n=251 genomic tests). All outcomes significantly improved pre-and post-MoC (p<0.05): duplicate testing decreased (13.9% to 0%); variants of uncertain significance reduced (37.7% to 7.1%); informed consent documentation increased (70.5% to 88.4%); and diagnostic yield increased (16.2% to 27.4%). ConclusionTargeted interventions are needed to support delivery of genomic testing and strengthen service effectiveness.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.