Back

Accuracy of Tuberculosis Infection Diagnosis through IP-10-Based Assays for Immune Detection of Present Mycobacterium tuberculosis: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation

Stoichita, A.; Burecu, M.; Nita, C.; Teleaga, C.; Radu, A. D.; Mihai, M.; Mahler, B.; Ibraim, E.

2026-02-26 respiratory medicine
10.64898/2026.02.24.26346999 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundReliable detection of latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection (LTBI) remains challenging, particularly in TB contacts and immunocompromised individuals, where interferon-{gamma} release assays (IGRAs) demonstrate variable sensitivity. IP-10, a chemokine produced at substantially higher concentrations than IFN-{gamma}, represents a promising immune marker. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of two IP-10 based assays RIDA(R)QUICK TB (lateral flow) and RIDASCREEN(R) TB (ELISA), by comparison with QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) assay or a composite reference standard. MethodsA cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study enrolled 99 adults: 49 with culture-confirmed active pulmonary TB, 30 close TB contacts and 20 individuals with autoimmune disease, in Bucharest, Romania. All participants underwent RIDA Quick, RIDA Screen and QFT-Plus testing. Indeterminate results for all assays were reclassified using a composite reference standard. ResultsAgainst culture in active TB cases, RIDA(R)QUICK TB demonstrated a sensitivity of 85.7% (95% CI: 72.8-94.1) and PPV of 97.7%, while RIDA(R)SCREEN TB achieved 91.8% sensitivity (95% CI: 80.4-97.7) and 97.8% PPV. Specificity and NPV could not be reliably estimated due to the near-absence of true-negative individuals. Agreement with QFT-Plus was moderate to good ({kappa}=0.47-0.93).ROC analysis performed against QFT-Plus as a comparator demonstrated good immunological discrimination for RIDA(R)QUICK TB (AUC = 0.828) and RIDA(R)SCREEN TB (AUC = 0.767), reflecting concordance with QFT-Plus rather than diagnostic accuracy against confirmed infection. ConclusionIP-10 based assays demonstrated higher sensitivity than QFT-Plus and excellent PPV across bacteriological standard, supporting their use as complementary tools for LTBI detection. Larger, more heterogeneous cohorts are needed to accurately define specificity and operational integration.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
4
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.0%
5
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.4%
6
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
9
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
10
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
11
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
12
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
13
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
14
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
17
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
18
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
19
Tuberculosis
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
20
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
23
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Journal of Fungi
31 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
28
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%