Back

CT-based Automated Volumetry as a Biomarker of Global and Split Renal Function in Living Kidney Donors

Fink, A.; Burzer, F.; Sacalean, V.; Rau, S.; Kaestingschaefer, K. F.; Rau, A.; Koettgen, A.; Bamberg, F.; Jaenigen, B.; Russe, M. F.

2026-02-26 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.02.24.26346974 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundKidney volumetry derived from CT has been proposed as a surrogate of renal function in living kidney donor evaluation. However, clinical integration has been limited by reader-dependent workflows and semiautomatic methods susceptible to image quality. PurposeTo evaluate whether fully automated CT-based segmentation of renal cortex, medulla and total parenchymal volume provides reproducible volumetric biomarkers associated with global and split renal function in living kidney donor candidates. Materials and MethodsIn this retrospective single-center study, 461 living kidney donor candidates (2003-2021) underwent contrast-enhanced abdominal CT. A convolutional neural network was trained to automatically segment cortical, medullary, and total parenchymal volumes on arterial-phase images. Segmentation performance was evaluated against manual reference annotations. Volumes were indexed to body surface area. Associations with eGFR, 24-hour creatinine clearance, cystatin C, and tubular clearance were assessed using Spearman correlation coefficient ({rho}), and side-specific volume fractions were compared with scintigraphy -derived split function. ResultsAutomated segmentation achieved excellent agreement with expert reference segmentations (Dice 0.95 for cortex; 0.90 for medulla). eGFR correlated moderately with cortical ({rho} = 0.46) and total parenchymal volume ({rho} = 0.45), and modestly with medullary volume ({rho} = 0.30). Similar associations were observed for other global measures, with the strongest correlation for cortical volume and tubular clearance ({rho} = 0.53). Side-specific volume fractions correlated with scintigraphy-derived split renal function ({rho} = 0.49-0.56; all p < 0.001). ConclusionAutomated CT-based renal subcompartment segmentation provides reproducible volumetric biomarkers within routine donor evaluation. Cortical volume performs comparably to total parenchymal volume and tracks split renal function at the cohort level, suggesting potential utility in donor assessment.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
19.3%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
12.8%
3
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
4
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
6
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
7
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
52 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
8
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
9
Kidney International
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
10
American Journal of Transplantation
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
11
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
12
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
13
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
14
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
15
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
17
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
18
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
24
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.5%
25
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
26
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
27
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%