Back

Study protocol for microneurographic investigation of nociceptor sensitisation in Fibromyalgia Syndrome. (MICRO-FMS)

Ajay, E. A.; Khan, F.; Bhattacharjee, A.; Pickering, A. E.; Dunham, J. P.

2026-02-26 pain medicine
10.64898/2026.02.24.26346973 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionChronic pain in fibromyalgia may be driven by abnormal ongoing activity in a subclass of C-fibre nociceptors known as Type1B or CMi nociceptors. As is common in C-nociceptor microneurography studies, the modest patient numbers in these prior studies generate large confidence intervals around the point estimate of the prevalence of this abnormal activity. This complicates the interpretation of the relative importance of this ongoing nociceptor activity as a pain generating mechanism in fibromyalgia. The study aims to improve precision via an adaptive Bayesian protocol that maximises the yield and quality of data collection whilst minimising patient burden. MethodsThe study employs an optimised microneurography protocol with an adaptive study design. The microneurography protocol incorporates early identification of CMi nociceptors via an abbreviated activity dependent slowing protocol to increase yields enabling efficient collection of the primary outcome data. The adaptive study design will use Bayesian principles to iteratively assess the predictive probability of futility, and terminate early if there is high confidence that the hypothesis is false. Furthermore, the study will employ questionnaires to explore links with pain in the area under study to the electrophysiology data. Finally, quantitative sensory testing will be used to investigate whether the irritable nociceptor phenotype is associated with abnormalities in CMi nociceptor physiology. Ethics & DisseminationThis study has received HRA REC approval in the UK. Participants will provide written informed consent, and may withdraw at any time without consequence. At the end of the study, the results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, and the data made available via a data repository. Strengths & limitations of this studyBayesian predictive probability of futility to minimise patient burden in microneurography Microneurography for objective interrogation of the peripheral nervous system Optimised microneurography protocol to efficiently answer primary hypotheses Subjective elements of early termination criteria of the study assessed and co-developed with Patient and Public Inclusion and Engagement Group

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
33.8%
2
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.1%
3
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
5
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.1%
7
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
8
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
9
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
10
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
11
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
12
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
13
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
14
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
15
Neurotherapeutics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
16
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.9%
18
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
19
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
22
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
23
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%