Plasma Lipid Alterations Track Multidimensional Psychosis Severity Across Diagnostic Boundaries
Thanabalasingam, A.; Wiegand, A.; Meijer, J.; Dwyer, D. B.; Schulte, E. C.; The PsyCourse Study,
Show abstract
BackgroundLipidomic alterations have been reported across schizophrenia (SCZ) and bipolar disorder (BD), but findings are heterogeneous and often overlap across diagnoses, limiting diagnostic specificity. Associations between lipid profiles and illness severity have also been inconsistent when assessed using single symptom scales, raising the possibility that unidimensional measures fail to capture biologically relevant variation. Whether plasma lipidomic alterations relate to multidimensional psychosis severity, and how they relate to polygenic liability, remains unclear. MethodsWe examined associations among psychiatric and cognitive polygenic risk scores (PRS), plasma lipidomics (361 species across 16 classes), and a machine-learning-derived severe psychosis probability score in a transdiagnostic cohort of individuals with SCZ or BD (PRS n=1,320; lipid subset n=428). Regression and lipid class enrichment analyses tested severity associations. Mediation and canonical correlation analyses assessed integrated genetic-lipid-severity relationships. ResultsSCZ-PRS (positive), BD-PRS (negative), and educational attainment PRS (negative) showed modest associations ({beta} = |0.02|) with severe psychosis probability. Lipid class enrichment analysis identified nine classes associated with severity, including increased sphingolipids (dSM, dCer), phosphatidylcholines (PC), triacylglycerides (TAG), and phosphatidylethanolamine plasmalogens (PE-P), alongside decreased phosphatidylcholine plasmalogens (PC-P). Most lipid class associations were robust to adjustment for diagnosis and medication. No significant mediation or shared multivariate genetic-lipid structure was observed. ConclusionsPlasma lipidomic variation tracks multidimensional psychosis severity across diagnostic boundaries. These findings suggest that lipidomic alterations may reflect transdiagnostic biological processes linked to illness burden that are not fully captured by categorical diagnoses, single symptom scales, or common-variant polygenic risk.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Dysregulated lipid metabolism precedes onset of psychosis in people at clinical high risk 95%
- Multivariate Resting-State Functional Connectivity Features Linked to Transdiagnostic Psychopathology in Early Psychosis 95%
- Connectivity patterns of task-specific brain networks allow individual prediction of cognitive symptom dimension of schizophrenia and link to molecular architecture 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic overlap between psychotic experiences in the community across age and with psychiatric disorders 96%
- Molecular, physiological and functional features underlying cortical thinning related to antipsychotic medication use 95%
- Evaluating the role of common risk variation in the recurrence risk of schizophrenia in multiplex schizophrenia families 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Increased Prevalence of Rare Copy Number Variants in Treatment-Resistant Psychosis 95%
- Altered sex differences in hippocampal subfield volumes in schizophrenia 94%
- Exploring the relationship between schizophrenia and cardiovascular disease: A genetic correlation and multivariable Mendelian randomization study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Connectome-based predictive modeling of early and chronic psychosis symptoms 95%
- Estimating the direct effects of the genetic liabilities to bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and behavioral traits on suicide attempt using a multivariable Mendelian randomization approach 94%
- Interactions between hippocampal activity and striatal dopamine in people at clinical high risk for psychosis: relationship to clinical outcomes 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.