Back

Unsupervised Machine Learning of Computed Tomography Angiography Features Uncovers Unique Subphenotypes of Aortic Stenosis With Differential Risks of Conduction Disturbances Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

El Zeini, M.; Fang, M.; Tran, M. P.; Badarabandi, U.; Liu, C.; Malik, S. B.; Kang, G.; Sayed, N.; Sallam, K.; Chang, A. Y.; Chen, I. Y.

2026-02-25 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.02.24.26346951 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundVarious measurements around the aortic valve are typically made on computed tomography angiograms (CTAs) before transcathether aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for aortic stenosis (AS), but their collective prognostic inference on periprocedural conduction disturbances (CDs) is not known. Here, we aimed to use unsupervised machine learning (UML) to analyze a multitude of pre-TAVR CTA features and uncover patient subphenotypes with differential risks of CDs. MethodsTwelve nonredundant features involving the aortic valve, aortic root, and ascending aorta were extracted from the CTAs of 660 AS patients. UML of these features using agglomerative hierarchical clustering was performed on separate male and female datasets, with the optimal number of clusters determined by 30 cluster indices. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to assess the dependence of CDs on cluster type and the latters incremental prognostic value over conventional risk factors. ResultsThree male clusters were optimally identified (M1-M3): M1 was associated with small valve leaflet calcification loads and aortic root dimensions; both M2 and M3 were associated with large valve leaflet calcification loads and a wide aortic root, but the aortic root was shorter in M2 than M3. Two female clusters were optimally determined (F1-F2): F2 was associated with larger valve leaflet calcification loads and aortic root dimensions. By logistic regression analysis, compared to M1 (reference), M2, but not M3, was more associated with CDs (ORM2/M1=2.15, P=0.032; ORM3/M1=2.12, P=0.085), with no difference between M3 and M2 (ORM3/M2=0.986, P=0.974) or between F1 and F2 (ORF2/F1=1.294, P=0.581). Including cluster type as a predictor in a regression model of CDs containing conventional risk factors as covariates improved the goodness-of-fit (P=0.020). ConclusionsUML of pre-TAVR CTAs can reveal subgroups of male patients with differential risks for CDs and improve prognostication over conventional risk factors. UML-augmented pre-TAVR CTAs may help better guide personalized strategies to minimize CDs.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
14.0%
2
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
4
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.2%
5
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
7
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.7%
8
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.9%
9
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.3%
11
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
12
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
13
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
14
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
15
Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.2%
17
Hypertension
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
18
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
19
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
20
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.6%
22
Nature Cardiovascular Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
23
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
24
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%