Back

Exploring Burnout and Mindfulness among Medical Researchers: A Global Cross-Sectional Survey

Ng, J. Y.; Syed, N.; Melendez, G.; Bilc, M. I.; Koch, A. K.; Cramer, H.

2026-02-26 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.02.24.26346825 medRxiv
Show abstract

Burnout, a state of chronic exhaustion often characterized by feelings of emotional exhaustion, cognitive and emotional dysregulation, and psychological distancing, is an increasingly recognized issue within most professions. This syndrome results in diminished job satisfaction, strained interpersonal relationships, and decreased well-being. Socio-demographic factors have been shown to play a role in burnout risk, while trait mindfulness has been identified as an effective method to mitigate it. This study aimed to identify the prevalence of burnout risk and its relationship with mindfulness and socio-demographics among medical researchers. An anonymous, online, cross-sectional survey was administered to corresponding authors published in MEDLINE. The survey consisted of screening and socio-demographic questions, as well as validated assessment tools (i.e., shortened work-related Burnout Assessment Tool [BAT-12] and shortened Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory [FMI-14]). Responses were analysed according to the BAT and FMI guidelines, alongside regression analyses. A total of 1,732 participants completed the survey, yielding a response rate of 1.88%. Overall, 38.8% of participants were at risk or at very high risk of burnout, and the mean mindfulness score was 37.51. Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that sex, age, and employment status were significant predictors of burnout risk, while age and region significantly predicted mindfulness. Hierarchical regression analysis showed that, after controlling for socio-demographic variables, mindfulness was a strong and independent negative predictor of burnout risk. These findings on burnout risk and the influence of mindfulness and socio-demographics could guide future research in developing tailored interventions and policies that improve the well-being of medical researchers.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 4%
27.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.8%
3
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.7%
4
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.1%
5
Consciousness and Cognition
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
7
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
8
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
9
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.5%
10
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
11
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
12
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
13
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.4%
14
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
15
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
17
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
18
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
23
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
24
Journal of Infection and Public Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
25
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
29
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
30
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%