Back

Career mentoring matters: A multi-component program for early-stage HIV investigators at the University of California, San Francisco

Fuchs, J. D.; Melo, J. S.; Sauceda, J. A.; Watabe, J.; Sterling, L.; Johnson, M. O.; Gandhi, M.

2026-03-02 medical education
10.64898/2026.02.24.26346718 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEvidence supports the key role research mentors play in bolstering the success of early stage investigators (ESI). However, there are limited data about the impact of supplemental, cross-disciplinary career mentorship and professional development opportunities for ESIs seldom included during academic training. We assessed the perceived value of this approach among post-doctoral fellows and early career faculty who participated in a multi-component career mentoring program organized by the University of California, San Francisco Center for AIDS Research (UCSF CFAR). MethodsWe surveyed past program participants (2005-2020), assessing demographics, current career status, perceived impact of the program, and feedback on program elements. We performed thematic analysis on open-ended responses to explore program benefits. ResultsOf 146 program participants contacted, 102 responded (70% response rate). Over two thirds (65%) were female, and 38% self-identified as underrepresented minority (URM) investigators. A majority of respondents now dedicate >70% of their time to research. All would recommend the program to ESI colleagues, and over 80% reported that their CFAR mentors influenced their career trajectories in several ways, including help with grant writing, linkage to researchers sparking new collaborations, and support through personal challenges or navigating conflict with primary research mentors. While 90% of URM ESIs valued advice from CFAR mentors, only a third reported receiving specific support around challenges faced as minoritized investigators. ConclusionsA career mentoring program designed to complement the support offered by research mentors positively influenced the career trajectory of ESIs. Focused efforts are needed to support URM investigators who face ongoing structural barriers to success in academic settings.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
24.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 4%
24.6%
3
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.0%
5
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
6
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.6%
8
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
9
Journal of the International AIDS Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 69%
1.0%
11
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
12
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
13
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
14
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
15
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
16
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
17
Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
18
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
19
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
20
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%