Back

Long-Term Healthcare Utilization After Genomic Diagnosis in Seriously Ill Children

Dias, J. M. L.; More, R. P.; Butler, D.; Aldus, C.; Brown, J.; French, C. E.; Dolling, H.; Raymond, L.; Rowitch, D. H.; Aiken, C. E.

2026-02-26 pediatrics
10.64898/2026.02.24.26345973 medRxiv
Show abstract

ImportanceWhole genome sequencing (WGS) is increasingly used to diagnose severely ill children, yet the long-term impact of a genetic diagnosis on healthcare utilization and resource allocation remains poorly understood. ObjectiveTo determine the influence of a genetic diagnosis via WGS on long-term healthcare utilization metrics in severely ill children. DesignA retrospective cohort study using data from the Next Generation Children study (2016-2020) with record linkage and analysis of primary care records conducted between 2022 and 2024. SettingA multicenter study involving primary care and hospital records linked via the UK National Health Research Institute (NIHR) Rare Disease Bioresource, Cambridge, UK. ParticipantsA referred sample of 270 severely ill children who underwent WGS. Exposure(s)Receipt of a genetic diagnosis (87/270; 32%) compared to those who remained undiagnosed (183/270; 68%) following WGS. Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s)Comparison of 36 healthcare utilization parameters, including hospitalizations, primary care prescriptions, and diagnostic tests. ResultsAmong the 270 children analyzed, those receiving a genetic diagnosis (n=87) exhibited significantly higher overall healthcare utilization compared to undiagnosed peers (n=183). This included increased hospital admissions and outpatient visits, particularly for neurodevelopmental and seizure-related conditions. Diagnosed children received a higher volume of neurological, gastrointestinal, and nutritional prescriptions. The most pronounced differences in utilization were observed in children initially diagnosed in neonatal (NICU) or pediatric (PICU) intensive care settings. While genetic diagnosis was not associated with reduced healthcare costs during the study period, it was linked to more targeted, condition-specific medical care. Conclusions and RelevanceWGS diagnosis facilitates the integration of specialist care and the alignment of healthcare resources with the specific needs of children with complex disorders. These findings suggest that while costs may not decrease immediately, a diagnosis enables more precise and targeted clinical management. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSDoes a genetic diagnosis through whole genome sequencing influence long-term healthcare utilization in severely ill children? FindingsIn this cohort study of 270 children, those who received a genetic diagnosis demonstrated significantly greater overall healthcare utilization, including more hospitalizations and targeted prescriptions, compared with undiagnosed children. MeaningA genetic diagnosis facilitates the integration of specialized, condition-specific care, helping to align healthcare resources with the individual needs of children with complex disorders.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
25.9%
2
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.7%
3
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.9%
6
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
7
JAMA Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
8
Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
9
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
11
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
12
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
13
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
14
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
15
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
16
Epilepsia
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
17
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
21
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
22
Epilepsia Open
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
23
Autism Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
25
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
27
npj Science of Learning
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
28
BioData Mining
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%