Back

A plant-based biostimulant modulates grapevine susceptibility within a realistic water stress window through priming and phenylpropanoid pathway regulation

Poucet, T.; Chen, G.; Bourg, J.; Busuttil, A.-M.; Delmas, C.; Dufour, M. C.

2026-02-24 plant biology
10.64898/2026.02.23.707262 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Fluctuating extreme weather events, coupled with rising average temperatures, can severely impact grapevine physiology and yield. While biostimulants have been gaining acceptance as a short-terms tools to enhance grapevine resilience, their adoption is hindered by inconsistent efficacy, partly driven by unpredictable plant stress levels. Over two contrasting seasons, we integrated physiological, transcriptomic, and metabolomic analyses to investigate how a plant-based biostimulant modulates the sensibility of Vitis vinifera under varying intensities of heat, drought, and their combination. This panel of water status, ranging from -0.02 to -1.6 MPa, revealed that the physiological response induced by the biostimulant treatment alleviates water stress within a field-relevant hydraulic window located between -0.4 and -1.2 MPa. Moreover, moderate but constitutive reduction of growth parameters in biostimulant plants, suggests a trade-off between vegetative development and abiotic stress responses. Accordingly, gene expression analysis revealed an interaction between water availability and the plant response to the biostimulant, which suggest an activation of priming mechanisms. Metabolic profiling supported these findings, highlighting the central role of phenylpropanoid pathway modulation, together with adjustments in ROS dynamics and stress-related hormone responses, particularly abscisic acid. Overall, this work emphasizes the need for integrating detailed plant water status and leaf gas exchange to accurately evaluate biostimulant performances under abiotic stress.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
22.4%
2
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.4%
3
Environmental and Experimental Botany
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.6%
7
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
9
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
10
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
11
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
12
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
13
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
14
Physiologia Plantarum
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
15
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
17
Plant Science
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
18
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%
20
PROTEOMICS
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
21
Plant Molecular Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%