Back

Stabilizing selection on a polygenic trait from the gene's-eye view.

Courau, P.; Schertzer, E.; Lambert, A.

2026-03-06 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.02.23.706325 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We study a polygenic trait under stabilizing selection at statistical equilibrium, where genetic effect, mutation rate and mutational bias are heterogeneous across loci. The model assumes L biallelic sites subject to reversible mutations, each allele described by its frequency in the population. Using a diffusion approximation, a mean-field approximation and neglecting linkage disequilibrium, we predict consistent phenomena across several regimes of selection: (1) a small deviation {Delta}* of the trait mean from its optimal value appears and persists due to genetic mutations not aligned with selection; (2) while this deviation is often undetectable at the trait level, it leaves a substantial signature at the locus level by favoring alleles reducing it, resulting in genic selection with mean coefficient s* proportional to -{Delta}* acting pervasively; (3) with stronger selection on the trait, (3a) the value of {Delta}* is decreased but the intensity of genic selection is increased in inverse proportion, resulting in an essentially constant, non negligible value of s*. We show how the stationary distribution of allelic frequencies can be obtained from {Delta}*. The latter can then be characterized as the solution to a fixed-point equation. Finally, we quantify several macroscopic observables of interest (genetic variance, description of the fluctuations of the trait mean as an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process). The orders of magnitude of the macroscopic observables can be derived on a wide region of the parameter space. The model shows good fit and can straightforwardly be extended to accommodate pleiotropy, dominance, and some forms of epistasis. We also discuss the different breakdown which may occur (Bulmer effect, Hill-Robertson effect, breakdown of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck approximation for the dynamics of the trait mean, depletion of genetic variability due to low mutation rates).

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
40.6%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.6%
50% of probability mass above
3
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.7%
4
Theoretical Population Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.1%
6
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
7
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
8
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
9
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
10
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
11
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
12
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
13
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
14
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
15
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.7%
17
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.7%
19
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
20
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%