Back

Patient-centric radiology: Utilising large language models (LLMs) to improve patient communication and education

Yip, A.; Craig, G.; White, N. M.; Cortes-Ramirez, J.; Shaw, K.; Reddy, S.

2026-02-25 health informatics
10.64898/2026.02.23.26346923 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeTo evaluate whether large language models (LLMs) can enhance clinician-patient communication by simplifying radiology reports to improve patient readability and comprehension. MethodsA randomised controlled trial was conducted at a single healthcare service for patients undergoing X-ray, ultrasound or computed tomography between May 2025 and June 2025. Participants were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either (1) the formal radiology report only or (2) the formal radiology report and an LLM-simplified version. Readability scores, including the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, Automated Readability Index, Flesch Reading Ease, and Flesch-Kincaid grade level, were calculated for both reports. Statistical analysis of patient readability and comprehension levels, factual accuracy and hallucination rates for LLMs was assessed using a combination of binary and 5-point Likert scales, open-ended survey questions, and independent review by two radiologists. Results59/120 patients were randomised to receive both the formal and LLM-simplified radiology reports. Readability of LLM-simplified reports significantly improved with the reading level required for formal reports equivalent to a university-standard (11th-13th grade) compared to a middle-school standard (5th-9th grade) for simplified reports (rank biserial correlation=0.83, p<0.001). Patients with both reports demonstrated a significantly greater comprehension level, with 95% reporting an understanding level greater than 50%, compared with 46% without the simplified report (rank biserial correlation = 0.67, p < 0.001). All LLM-simplified reports were considered at least somewhat accurate with a minimal hallucination rate of 1.7%. Importantly, no hallucinations resulted in potential patient harm. 118/120 (98.3%) patients expressed interest in simplified radiology reports to be included in future clinical practice. ConclusionThis study provides evidence that LLMs can simplify radiology reports to an accessible level of readability with minimal hallucination. LLMs improve both ease of readability and comprehension of radiology reports for patients. Therefore, the rapid advancement of LLMs shows strong potential in enhancing patient-radiologist communication as patient access to electronic health records is increasingly adopted. HighlightsO_LIRadiology reports can be complex and difficult for patients to read and interpret C_LIO_LIStrong patient demand exists for simplified radiology reports C_LIO_LILarge language models (LLMs) such as GPT-4o show promise in simplifying radiology reports C_LIO_LILLMs credibly simplify radiology reports with minimal hallucination rates C_LIO_LILLMs improve both patient readability and comprehension of radiology reports C_LI

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.6%
3
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.3%
4
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.3%
5
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.7%
7
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
9
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
10
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
12
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
14
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
15
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
16
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
18
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
19
NMR in Biomedicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
20
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
21
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
22
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
23
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
24
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
25
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
26
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
27
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
28
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
29
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
30
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%