Back

Population-Wide Assessment of Heart Rhythm and Physical Activity from 14-Day Recordings: The UK Biobank Cardiac Monitoring Study

van Duijvenboden, S.; El-Medany, A.; Aggour, H.; Orini, M.; Bai, W.; Gallacher, J. E.; Hopewell, J. C.; Bell, S.; Ng, F. S.; Doherty, A.; Casadei, B.

2026-02-24 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.02.23.26346310 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundLong-term electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring with wearable devices enables large-scale characterisation of cardiac rhythms, but population-based evidence remains limited. The UK Biobank Cardiac Monitoring Study integrates 14-day patch-based ECG monitoring with accelerometry and detailed phenotypic and lifestyle data. Here, we report the acquisition protocol, data processing, and initial findings from 27,658 participants. MethodsParticipants in the UK Biobank imaging study were invited to undergo 14-day cardiac monitoring using a Zio XT (pilot phase; 2015-18) or BodyGuardian MINI (main phase; 2019- ongoing) monitor. ECGs were analysed by certified technicians and automated algorithms to identify atrial, ventricular, and conduction arrhythmias. In parallel, beat-to-beat RR intervals were derived using in-house algorithms, and physical activity from calibrated triaxial accelerometer data. Analyses assessed wear time, arrhythmia prevalence, circadian patterns, and repeatability. FindingsIn total, 27,658 participants (mean age 71 years; 49.9% women) were analysed, including 7,795 from the pilot phase and 21,141 from the main phase; 1,353 (4.9%) had repeat recordings. In the main phase, median wear time was 13.2 days (IQR 11.9-13.9), and undiagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF) was detected more frequently in men than women (3.2% vs 1.7%; p<0.001); 68% was paroxysmal, with 27.4% detected during week two. Ventricular tachycardia occurred in 12.1% (8.4% in women), with sustained episodes rare (0.4%) but observed. Arrhythmia timing varied markedly with activity, with AF peaking during nocturnal inactivity and ventricular ectopy increasing during activity, peaking at midday. Repeat assessments showed strong reproducibility of diurnal heart rate and activity profiles, with more modest arrhythmia consistency. InterpretationExtended ECG monitoring enables detection of subclinical arrhythmias and long-term physiological rhythms in older adults. Linkage to imaging, multi-omics, and clinical outcomes in UK Biobank will enable unprecedented evaluation of the natural history of asymptomatic rhythm disturbances and their impact on brain health. FundingBritish Heart Foundation and Wellcome Trust.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.7%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 23%
8.3%
3
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
6
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
7
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
8
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
9
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
10
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
11
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.7%
15
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
16
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
17
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
18
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
22
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 68%
0.7%
24
Nature Cardiovascular Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
27
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
28
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%